Summary

Elon Musk and his “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) have been granted access to the U.S. Treasury’s federal payment system, raising concerns about security and misuse.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent approved the move after a top Treasury official was ousted for resisting.

Critics warn Musk could freeze payments to government programs or manipulate federal contracts.

The move coincides with DOGE’s takeover of the Office of Personnel Management.

Experts call it a dangerous power grab, as Musk holds no official government position.

  • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Why are we coming up with nonsense scare tactic arguments? He’s obviously just going to divert federal funds to himself via his companies.

    He has no need for a bunch of shitters’ SSN when he would just open himself to the greatest class action in history because it would take about 100 million of us to make him any significant wealth.

  • AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    And it’s only a matter of time until until he boasts about it by posting someone’s SN during an petty online argument.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair the social security number is not exactly the most secure thing in the world. More than likely there’s a lot of people who have your social security number and you don’t have any clue that they do.

    That being said, I don’t understand why he’s being allowed this kind of access. Even with the Orange douchebag’s blessing, there should be other people minding the store. Shouldn’t there?

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      there should be other people minding the store. Shouldn’t there?

      There was until they were removed and yes man installed

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Elon Musk and his “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE)

    Is that seriously what it’s called? Elon Musk is producing enough cringe to power all of human civilization. I have no idea if this is the worst timeline or not, but it’s certainly the most embarrassing.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everyone has my social security number. It’s one of the stupidest security fails of all time that nobody seems to want to fix. And now there is an entire “credit protection” industry so it will remain that way.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          2 days ago

          Unfortunately, most people have their taxes withheld from their paychecks, and file their returns so they get a refund.

          If people didn’t file returns, the IRS would end up with more money.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            and file their returns so they get a refund.

            which is unfortunate since it means you gave the government an interest-free loan during the year. It’s better to adjust withholding amounts to try and break even, or owe money (but not too much that you get hit with an underpayment penalty)

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      112
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s weird that SSNs are treated as some sort of secret number given they don’t have any security features. They were never supposed to be used the way they’re used today, but there’s no good alternative yet.

      The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI (public key infrastructure) where you can generate new ID numbers based on a private key. Each bank, lender, employer, etc that needs it would get a unique ID that only works for them, and you could revoke access for just that one company if needed.

      Kinda like how OAuth/OIDC login works, where you can log in to sites using your Google account, Apple account, self-hosted Authentik or Authelia, etc. but the site you’re logging in to never sees your password. If a site/app misbehaves, you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        And also the same thing but for payments, phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses, etc.

        We’re all giving away so much personal information every time we make a transaction, and we’ve all seen what these fuckers do with it.

          • LedgeDrop@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yeah, I tried to help my grandma with installing/using a video conference app… at the end of the day, I just call her (and yes, she still has a landline) :).

        • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Here’s your ID. You can decide who gets to have it.

          Easy. The average person isn’t going to care about the nerdy shit behind it, any more than they care how Facebook works behind the scenes.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 days ago

            They’ve been pushing against a national ID for decades so good luck convincing grandma it’s not the mark of the beast or something.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              They’ve been pushing against a national ID

              But the USA is already using a (very poor) national ID - the SSN.

      • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI… you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working

        There is already an open standard growing around exactly this concept, Web5 Distributed IDs (DID): https://dev.to/tbdevs/what-is-web5-233o

        Disclosure: I worked on the implementation for an Open Banking company (does that need to be disclosed? <shrug> I’m including it lest someone think I’m a shill)

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Authentication and two-factor system have actual security features. Social security numbers have no security features at all. They were never designed to be used as a security token.

    • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because the social security number has become the default way to uniquely identify an individual in the US despite the fact that it was never intended for that function.

      • FellowHuman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I get that, I just can’t comprehend, how you can do anything with it. In my country we have similar thing. We have “Birth number” and it is on every contract we sign. But just knowing it does jack shit. (But yeah, we also have identity card, and that changes number every renewal/loss)

        More context:

        For online sign you would need atleast 2 identifications (for example Identity cars and passport). And usualy thay make you come anyway to prove you’re you.

        It is bafeling to me, that some peaple in US have no means of identification.

        • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          For a long time, many companies treated the SSN as a sort of secure password that only the individual would know. Some companies still do. Others, like schools and the military, just treated it like what it is. A unique id number. If you know name, address and SSN, it’s possible to do a lot of different things that can create headaches for the person who was targeted. New credit cards, bank accounts, loans, transferred utilities, rental agreements.

  • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thanks to Verizon/TMobile/AT&T being the swiss cheese fort Knox, I’d be surprised if Felon Skum didn’t have it.

    Companies have played fast and loose with our PII for so long that it’s at a point where we need something else to act as that value so it’s actually secret. But with this administration, that would end up being a wrist tattoo…

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I already have a suspicion that he might already be leaking information out to third parties from Twitter (private messages, etc.), so…

  • no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Just to culture shock Americans: it’s not exactly the same but in Sweden our personal numbers are kept in the open. Even online. Searchable databases with names, phone numbers, addresses etc. It tells you if someone has a dog. It tells you if they have a car. Which car, even. Some tell you the income of the person you’re searching for. Sites even exist that could tell you if I’ve commited a crime. Some people think that’s unreasonable. Irresponsible even!

    That said, as pertains to the article, the fact that he has that info seems pretty unreasonable and irresponsible.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      At least in the past, you could use a person’s ssn to open credit cards, change utilities, and generally ruin someone’s life. Someone took out a credit card with my SSN when I was like 9 or 10 and it caused issues when I became an adult and tried to get a student loan for uni.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That is technically possible with our information too. It happens, but is bothersome. Taking out massive loans is possible too, with the right bank on the right day.

        You’d need some way to verify the identity, but since such signatures are handled digitally through an app it’s just a good phishing call away really. You already have the phone number and the address if you have the personal identification number.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          In the US, if you know someone’s address (which is trivially easy to find online) and their social security number, you can open credit cards online.
          The number itself is considered secure, so knowledge of the number is assumed to be enough identity confirmation for most applications.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That is technically possible with our information too. It happens, but is bothersome.

          Ohh well in that case, I’m sure nobody would bother taking advantage of it for free money…

          • no banana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Oh, it totally happens. It’s not that I wanted to say that it’s too bothersome. Scammers will do what scammers do.

            There’s actually been some talk about gangs running such business from Spain. Mostly scamming old people.

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s not that we don’t have all that info and more available, it’s that we want you to pay a data broker for it.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Some of this data, like commited crimes, is usually behind such a barrier here too. Though it is possible, even if a bit more complex, to get that info by yourself directly from the courts.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      My USA town will let you look up your taxes with just your last name and first initial. You can find out what real estate and car someone owns with that. Dog license seems to be in a different system.

      My salary is public information because I’m a public employee.

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    All of my data got breached multiple times going back to the dot-com bubble days, by Yahoo, the original 2015 OPM Beach and by two of the big credit bureaus for a start. If Musk has my social at this point it doesn’t matter.