Summary

Elon Musk and his “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) have been granted access to the U.S. Treasury’s federal payment system, raising concerns about security and misuse.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent approved the move after a top Treasury official was ousted for resisting.

Critics warn Musk could freeze payments to government programs or manipulate federal contracts.

The move coincides with DOGE’s takeover of the Office of Personnel Management.

Experts call it a dangerous power grab, as Musk holds no official government position.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      113
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s weird that SSNs are treated as some sort of secret number given they don’t have any security features. They were never supposed to be used the way they’re used today, but there’s no good alternative yet.

      The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI (public key infrastructure) where you can generate new ID numbers based on a private key. Each bank, lender, employer, etc that needs it would get a unique ID that only works for them, and you could revoke access for just that one company if needed.

      Kinda like how OAuth/OIDC login works, where you can log in to sites using your Google account, Apple account, self-hosted Authentik or Authelia, etc. but the site you’re logging in to never sees your password. If a site/app misbehaves, you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And also the same thing but for payments, phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses, etc.

        We’re all giving away so much personal information every time we make a transaction, and we’ve all seen what these fuckers do with it.

          • LedgeDrop@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yeah, I tried to help my grandma with installing/using a video conference app… at the end of the day, I just call her (and yes, she still has a landline) :).

        • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Here’s your ID. You can decide who gets to have it.

          Easy. The average person isn’t going to care about the nerdy shit behind it, any more than they care how Facebook works behind the scenes.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 days ago

            They’ve been pushing against a national ID for decades so good luck convincing grandma it’s not the mark of the beast or something.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              They’ve been pushing against a national ID

              But the USA is already using a (very poor) national ID - the SSN.

      • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI… you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working

        There is already an open standard growing around exactly this concept, Web5 Distributed IDs (DID): https://dev.to/tbdevs/what-is-web5-233o

        Disclosure: I worked on the implementation for an Open Banking company (does that need to be disclosed? <shrug> I’m including it lest someone think I’m a shill)