

It actually is.
It actually is.
100% this.
While I appreciate your frustration regarding all the USA news, that’s the news that is posted to !news@lemmy.world
If you would like to see news from other nations in this FEDERATED community, feel free to post news from around the globe.
I wish you the best.
Anyway…
I’m out of the loop. What’s with that comment?
We do allow [META] posts, when in good faith and on topic.
Allowing this to stay up.
I’m too thick skinned too let this get to me.
Having 5 kids will do that
Have fun.
I mean, we’re big boys, with our big boy pants and all!
Let’s see how they respond when they can’t unnerve us…
I agree. The mods here are idiots.
For example, we reversed this ban.
Please, make this. I have too many communities, or I would
You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.
You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.
“I never consent to searches”
“I don’t answer questions. Am I detained, or am I free to leave?”
My gut says he’s going to use the ethics in government act as an excuse to dump.
Crossover:
1 with 3
2 with 6
Not as much as you’d think.
Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran
I’m another mod of the community. Admiral didn’t let me know they were doing this.
I still 100% support their actions regardless.
If it’s a bug, wow. Almost 250 years, and they can’t fix it?
Also, judges are there to make sure both sides play by the rules.
It’s actually the conclusion of 2 things:
If both hold true, then logically, a jury can make a decision against legal precedent, without fear of repercussion - unless they are paid/coerced to come to that conclusion, and the defendant - once cleared by by a jury - cannot be tried again.
This means that legally, a jury can say GTFO to jury instructions set by judges.
The OP marked this as satire. Leaving it up.