It was worth a pretty penny. Ended stuff by cussing each other out and blocking. Have a spare key to his place he doesn’t know about. He isn’t currently there. What do

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, a B&E is pretty much always a bad idea, imo. My advice would be to hang on to that key and try to discuss a repatriation of goods with him. You two could work out a way to do this with minimal face-to-face interaction if things are still a bit too raw. You can then “oh, I just remembered about this” the dupe key back to him.

    If this doesn’t work out, then a B&E stops being a bad idea.

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Fair enough, although I don’t think the police would much care about this detail if charges were pressed:)) That’s why I suggested trying to solve things amiably first, it’d be a nice little exculpatory element in case things fall apart and OP is required to… procure their stuff directly.

        Although this does raise a good point, in that OP may even try involving the police should their ex refuse to return their things, although they’d require proof of ownership for that…

        • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I think your advice is right, definitely better to settle it with consent if possible

    • ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If that doesn’t work out, B&E becomes an even worse idea. If you ask the guy to get your PlayStation back, and he says no, and then the PlayStation magically disappears from his locked apartment 2 weeks later, who do you think they’re gonna come looking for?

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        If the person says no in the first place, that can be considered theft/illegal appropriation of private property. I can’t see it being worse to access an ex’s home with the spare key to retrieve solely what’s appropriate in that case.