“I was 34 years old, in what I would consider incredible health. I worked out five to six days a week, very low body fat, ate really healthy, and was in no pain or anything, but I noticed some clotted blood in my stool on a few different occasions,” said Herting, who is now 44 and married to Amber. He added that his father was diagnosed with stage I colon cancer in his early 50s but said he had no other known family history of the disease.

Herting’s journey of battling early-onset cancer is an experience shared by a growing proportion of young adults.

Cancer patients are “increasingly shifting from older to middle-aged individuals,” according to a report released Wednesday by the American Cancer Society.

Among adults 65 and older, adults 50 to 64 and those younger than 50, “people aged younger than 50 years were the only one of these three age groups to experience an increase in overall cancer incidence” from 1995 to 2020, says the report, which was published in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

Even though the overall US population is aging, “we’re seeing a movement of cancer diagnosis into younger folks, despite the fact that there are more people that are in the older populations,” said Dr. William Dahut, chief scientific officer for the American Cancer Society.

“So cancer diagnoses are shifting earlier,” he said. “There’s something going on here.”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Screening is a normal thing these days…

    This is compared to 95 and earlier.

    People still had cancer then, they weren’t just finding out till later. Now we find out early and do treatments.

    We’d also need to compare general mortality rates. Dying from a car accident with undiagnosed cancer “hides” the cancer.

    This is a good data point, but we need more

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The mortality rate from car accidents has been continually dropping.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m buying a car for my own protection. Why would I want to pay any more money for someone else’s protection if they aren’t in the car I bought?

          /s

    • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Considering that 20 years ago, a person had a 1/3 chance of getting cancer over their lifetime, any increase among younger people is concerning

      • penguin_knight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        the guy above you is saying that 1/3 chance of being DIAGNOSED with cancer is not the same as 1/3 chance of having cancer.

        • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          (haven’t read this particular study)
          Most studies take those kinds of things into account

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m certain the study took this into account. Usually people doing studies aren’t idiots.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    I feel like in a decade or two when there is more time to study long-term effects, the answer to all these issues will be microplastics.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    So, if your dad died of colon cancer and you see blood in your stool…. Ya might wanna keep an eye on that.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    That must be some kind of record as far as incongruous article photos go!

    Those fuckers look almost DELIRIOUSLY happy next to an article about two of them being more likely to get cancer! 😄

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Cancer is the result of a lot of things. At its core, it’s a system run-amok due to:

      • Oxidation / free radicals.
      • Ionizing radiation damage.
      • Anything else that can damage the DNA itself (eg, asbestos).
      • Natural mutation / degradation having a cascading effect (copy of a copy).

      Cancer happens every day in your body, but most mutations are easily identified and your Killer T (and natural killer) Cells eliminate them or they self-destruct (gross oversimplification, certainly). Cancer arises when there’s a perfect storm that impacts these systems at a scale that can’t be contained.

      Stress is certainly one aspect of this. Chronic inflammation, chronic cortisol, CRP, etc… Is very taxing on the body.

      So generally: don’t stress your body out, don’t expose yourself to anything that damages your DNA acutely, and don’t so anything that requires a lot of turnover of new cells.