Oh noez! Anyway…

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      There’s the doxxing part and the date of purchase part, which was a way to give weight to the first part. I just corrected a mistake made by the OP regarding the date of purchase, I never said anything about if I approve of doxxing the owners or not.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I never said anything about if I approve of doxxing the owners or not.

        And I am specifically asking you, given your comment I replied to, if you approve doxxing the owners or not.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          And I’m not answering because it’s not related to this part of the conversation, but you can go ahead and talk about that with others since you seem to want to share your feelings on the subject.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              No, I replied to something that was being discussed, for some reason you’re just mad that it wasn’t the part you wanted me to talk about.

              If you didn’t want to talk about what I brought to the table then you shouldn’t have replied to me, simple as that.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                I replied asking you a specific question that you refused to answer. If you didn’t want to answer the question I asked you shouldn’t have replied to me instead of trying to dance around it. Simple as that.