• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I’m not sure what CIA involvement has to do with violence, but I think it’s very interesting that you’re denouncing the nonviolent revolution that got Putin’s minions out of power.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Because of the eventual violence that occurred. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              The eventual violence being what, the war a decade later?

              “Eventual violence” does not prove that non-violence can cause systemic change any more than Napoleon being crowned emperor proves all popular revolutions against monarchies fail.

              And I gave you one single example. There are so many others. Of course, I’m sure you’ll find some reason to say each one of them doesn’t count. “One guy got his toes stomped on, so it was violent!” or “all the people involved were dead within 80 years!” That sort of thing.