A historic United States port strike has been suspended and a tentative agreement was reached “on wages,” according to the International Longshoremen’s Association and the U.S. Maritime Alliance.

“Effective immediately, all current job actions will cease and all work covered by the Master Contract will resume,” the ILA and USMX said in a joint statement Thursday evening.

The tentative agreement would increase workers’ wages by 62% over the life of the 6-year contract, sources familiar confirm to ABC News.

This represents a significant increase from the shipping industry group’s offer of a 50% wage increase earlier this week. The union had been pushing for a 77% pay hike over six years.

The tentative agreement would bring the hourly wage for a top dockworker to $63 per hour at the end of the new contract, up from $39 per hour under the expired contract.

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      They asked for 77% pay raises over 6 years and negotiated for 62%. This is a decent deal. Any victory for labor is a victory for all our us. Sure there is still a lot of work to be done, but this is a win.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Hence the “ish.” It’s a victory. It could be a better one. That’s a 15% difference from what they wanted.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Adding to what everyone else said, this is still a tentative deal. This is not the final form of the contract they’ll sign.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Not necessarily. Prudent to start with an offer higher than your actual goal so you have room to bargain downward.

          • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Absolutely. This is collective bargaining 101. Look at the historic UAW strike of 2023 and what they asked for at the start. Discounting that it was the first trilateral strike against the big three automakers union history, they asked for an historic amount of benefits and workplace changes.

            -46% pay increase over contract duration

            -Restoration of pension

            -Retiree healthcare

            -Healthcare benefits for all

            -Cost of living adjustments

            -End to the wage tiers system that divides the laborers into different “classes” of workers

            -32-hour workweek with no loss in pay

            If you don’t go for audacious, you will get far less than you need.

            They got:

            -25% pay increase in wages over the 4.5 year contract, 11% at outset

            -Cost of living adjustments

            -$5k bonus

            -Elimination of the tiered wage system (Fucking huge)

            If they never went to bat for the audacious, they never would have gotten the tiered system removed. Now they have far more solidarity and collective bargaining power for the next negotiation. All because of audacious demands and striking unilaterally across the big three.

            This is just one contract negotiation and strike. Much work to still be done.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is what, 8% annually or so? Seems petty substantial to me.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Pretty substantial compared to the average American raise or pretty substantial compared to what should be fair and livable?

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You need to know the base wage before saying that. If they are getting a fair and livable wage now, and this raise is twice what inflation is over time, then this is great. If they are below a fair and livable wage, then this might be enough to get them up, depending on how far below they are.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That would require more than just the pay rate to judge. It seems to be a decent bump up, but I was under the impression that some of the concern that led to the strike was how automation was going to affect their job. $63/hour isn’t all that great if you have half the hours, or no job at all because they needed only half the workers.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            If preserving jobs regardless of technology were a criterion, we’d still have farriers in every town. Things change. Good on them for getting a pay raise, though. It’s hard and essential work.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      if you made $100k on the docks today, by 2030 you should make $162k. this is an excellent win for them.

    • Dubiousx99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Would you care to elaborate why you say that isn’t a huge pay raise? It seems quite significant to me.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Dock workers can make as little as $14 an hour. A 62% pay rise would bring it up to $22.68 an hour. Over 6 years. Sure, $40,000 a year is better than a lot of jobs. It’s still atrociously low considering the amount of back-breaking labor that can be involved.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          They seem to be okay with the labor since they are also against automation.