The new cabinet pulls in allies from the centre and right, despite left-wing parties winning France's election.

French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his new government almost three months after a snap general election delivered a hung parliament.

The long-awaited new line up, led by Prime Minister Michel Barnier, marks a decisive shift to the right, even though a left-wing alliance won most parliamentary seats.

It comes as the European Union puts France on notice over its spiralling debt, which now far exceeds EU rules.

Among those gaining a position in the new cabinet is Bruno Retailleau, a key member of the conservative Republicans Party founded by former president Nicolas Sarkozy.

Just one left-wing politician was given a post in the cabinet, independent Didier Migaud, who was appointed as justice minister.

France’s public-sector deficit is projected to reach around 5.6% of GDP this year and go over 6% in 2025. The EU has a 3% limit on deficits.

Michel Barnier, a veteran conservative, was named as Macron’s prime minister earlier this month.

Members of the left-wing alliance, the New Popular Front (NFP) have threatened a no-confidence motion in the new government.

Far-left leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon called for the new government to “be got rid of” as soon as possible.

On Saturday, before the cabinet announcement, thousands of left-wing supporters demonstrated in Paris against the incoming government, arguing that the left’s performance in the election was not taken into consideration.

Archive link

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    6·
    1 month ago

    You’re comparing a country that was a developed country more than 50 years ago to a country that has been a developing country in the last 50 years.

    Except, China has already caught up to the west and there is still steady progress happening. Hence Chinese people now being richer than Europeans.

    You’re not proving China is somehow doing better than the western world, you’re proving that China is reaching the same standard as the western world.

    Once again, that reading comprehension really needs work. It’s frankly embarrassing. From my previous reply.

    In fact, a typical Chinese adult is now richer than the typical European adult. https://archive.is/uzLgx

    Come back when you have an actual argument.

    Perhaps take your own advice here.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.eeEnglish
      24·
      1 month ago

      It found that Chinese median wealth per adult, at $26,752, now outstrips Europe, where the average adult has a wealth of $26,690. The European figure takes into account the whole of the continent, which includes many less wealthy nations in its southern and eastern regions.

      Yes, the average Chinese adult is richer than the average European by a whooping 0.22%. How about you read your own articles dumbass. It’s literally an example of China reaching the standard of the western world.

      EDIT. Forgot to bold a certain part so we can get back to that when you eventually start complaining about numbers again.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        2·
        1 month ago

        Yes, the average Chinese adult is richer than the average European by a whooping 0.22%. How about you read your own articles dumbass. It’s literally an example of China reaching the standard of the western world.

        Absolutely hilarious how you continue to ignore where China started. Explain to us why we don’t see the same thing happening in India for example. Explain why the standard of living in China is improving more rapidly anywhere or any time in history. Meanwhile, also explain why the standard of living in Europe is declining. Pretty clear who the actual dumbass here is.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.eeEnglish
          22·
          1 month ago

          Absolutely hilarious how you continue to ignore where China started.

          You’re comparing a country that was a developed country more than 50 years ago to a country that has been a developing country in the last 50 years. No shit one of them is going to show a lot of progress. It’s like comparing the progress a person does in the first 18 years of the life to the progress of someone from the age of 30 to 48.

          Explain to us why we don’t see the same thing happening in India for example.

          There’s a great article in HBR showing how India could become a significant global player by 2050 and what are the barriers that are preventing it. The same thing happening in India could be just a matter of time.

          Explain why the standard of living in China is improving more rapidly anywhere or any time in history.

          Foreign investment? Notice how the trend is almost identical with the household income you pointed at before

          Meanwhile, also explain why the standard of living in Europe is declining.

          Source?