jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agoWildlife Protections Take a Back Seat to SpaceX’s Ambitionswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down17
arrow-up194arrow-down1external-linkWildlife Protections Take a Back Seat to SpaceX’s Ambitionswww.nytimes.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareBahnd Rollard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoHe has no where to go, the ISS isnt exactly a luxury resort. Thats why I support his endevors to go to mars, because one day he may decide to take the trip (and not come back).
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoHe can just go up and go back down again like Bezos. He won’t even do that because he either doesn’t trust his own rockets, he’s a coward or both.
minus-squareBahnd Rollard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoBoth. Both? Yes. Both. Both is good.
He has no where to go, the ISS isnt exactly a luxury resort. Thats why I support his endevors to go to mars, because one day he may decide to take the trip (and not come back).
He can just go up and go back down again like Bezos. He won’t even do that because he either doesn’t trust his own rockets, he’s a coward or both.
Both.
Both?
Yes. Both.
Both is good.