Huge losses from national disasters prompt industry to jack up prices and pull back from some markets; ‘worst possible scenario’ for consumers

After Allstate suffered billions of dollars in losses and failed to get the rate increases it wanted, it resorted to the nuclear option. 

The insurance giant threatened last fall to stop renewing auto insurance for customers in three states that hadn’t given in to its demands, which would have left those policyholders scrambling for coverage. The states blinked.

In December, New Jersey approved auto rate increases for Allstate averaging 17%, and New York, a 15% hike. Regulators in California are allowing Allstate to boost auto rates by 30%, but still haven’t decided on its request for a 40% increase in home-insurance rates after the insurer refused to write new policies.

For many Americans, getting insurance for both their cars and homes has gone from a routine, generally manageable expense to a do-or-die ordeal that can strain household budgets.

Non-paywall link

  • bluGill@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    For starters you are supposed to demand better transit. While expensive, there is no reason you can’t get great transit to your sub division - and since it is great transit everyone could get rid of a car (not all cars: you keep the SUV to tow the boat!) and save money overall.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      While expensive, there is no reason you can’t get great transit to your sub division

      I believe the reason is in the first part of that sentence. Who’s going to pay for it? We’re not inside city limits. There’s only a city bus. There isn’t a county bus and there never has been.