• Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    US Sailor here. Iran is actually pretty scary. They have diesel submarines. They can sit silently in that sea and kill a carrier faster than any battle group could respond.

    • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think you are a bit confused here. The anime girl in this meme clearly states that Irans navy sucks

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Diesel-electric. They cruise around just under the surface on diesel, with snorkels to bring in air and expel exhaust. But, then they can shut down those diesel engines, fully submerge, and maneuver on batteries for a few days and maybe a hundred miles.

        While they are on diesel engines, they are loud, and stuck to the surface. While they are on batteries, they are silent. For the few days that they are submerged, they are quieter than our nuclear subs.

        Yeah, they pose a potential threat to a carrier group, but the “proportional response” to attacking a carrier would be the destruction of every naval facility they have, so not exactly a serious threat.

        • hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          Seeing as the proportional response to damaging a cruiser was deleting 1/2 their navy in 8 hrs… yeah

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t know anything about Iran’s subs, but Sweden’s famously stealthy diesel subs keep a big tank of liquid oxygen on board and mix the exhaust with seawater before releasing it

      • roguetrick@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Diesel subs use snorkles when using their engines and batteries for silent running. They work a lot like diesel/electric trains, in that the diesel engine is acting more like a generator for an electrical engine.

      • Vuraniute@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        IIRC from my C:MO experience, diesel subs (at least Greek ones that is) only use diesel above surface, and use batteries when submerged

    • I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is also why North Korea is nothing to sneeze at. They have the largest submarine fleet in the world, lots of people seem to overlook that fact.

      • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        11 months ago

        The short answer is “it’s complicated but yes, and practically no.” Nuclear submarines have the operation range to obfuscate their location orders of magnitude better than diesel. Diesel is quieter but their range makes tracking infinitely more feasible. “A needle in a haystack vs a splinter in pail of hay.” Nuclear is better at power projection, diesel is better at short range defense/offense.

      • PhineaZ@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 months ago

        Look at it this way: When a diesel sub is endangered, they can turn off everything and I mean EVERYTHING. Quiet as a mouse that doesn’t exist. However, it will have to resurface eventually. A nuclear sub cannot do that. The cooling pumps have to keep running. But they can stay under water pretty much indefinitely (until they run out of food).

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nuclear is quieter than diesel, but louder than electric. Diesel subs are on diesel for transit to/from their patrol area, and on battery for their short-range patrol. Nuclear subs are much quieter during transit, but slightly louder during a long-range patrol.

        Nuclear subs have to continuously pump cooling water; diesel-electrics can shut down pretty much everything that makes noise.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nuclear subs have cooling systems that need to be working constantly. This creates additional vibrations/noise on top of the propulsion system.s that would be pretty similar between both subs. As well as nuclear subs needing to be much bigger, so require propulsion that produce more noise

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Diesel submarines can literally turn off every system and just drift in the ocean currents silently, or loiter on the sea floor where they are indistinguishable from a rock.

      • Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Worth noting nuclear submarines have a sort of minimum-practical-size determined by the need for a functional nuclear reactor on board. Combined with the plain expense of nuclear reactors means that states can build way more ssk’s than ssn’s for a given budget. It’s often better to have three 25% chances of sinking the other guy than one 50% chance.

        • zarp86@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s often better to have three 25% chances of sinking the other guy than one 50% chance.

          Three 25% of sinking is the same as three 75% chance of not sinking. Which is (3/4) * (3/4) * (3/4) chance of not sinking, which is approximately a 42% chance of not sinking, which is a 58% chance of sinking. 58% > 50%, the math checks out.