Clerics don’t need to choose.
Clerics don’t need to choose.
Why are you getting down voted so much? Isn’t this just a post of you figuring out and explainig that dnd 5e isn’t the best fit for you (in a comedic way)? Did I misread the entire post?
What’s the system you wanted to try?
Horny Bard: “I do the Lobster”
Zealot Barbarian: “I die”
I think it is still fun. Just a different kind of fun. It shifts to a taktical game with lots of interesting strategic discussions instead of an exploration game.
Fish sauce and sriracha
If I can get wish, I will get wish.
We missed you
Well, of course it depends on the type of game and context, it just sounds a bit like an uninteresting tool, to just have a just invincible NPCs. I think special weaknesses make every NPC more interesting. Give the NPC a weakness (eg. Superman hs cryptonite or Lord Voldemord has Horcruxes).
It shouldn’t be invisibile in the first place.
If there is a local game store in a city nearby, you’ll likely find people, who are looking to play.
Was propapbly an emberassed employee paying it out of his own pocket, just pretending his company would even care a tiny bit.
I guess, my current situation is just not bad enough, to want a revolution.
But if one of the worse places in this world is gonna implementiert kommunism in a good way, I’ll be there and sign up for it.
The problem is: who is willing to bet their country on an experimental system that could turn out better but could also turn in a totalitarian system?
I disagree with your disagreement. Sure, if you already know your party and everyone is experienced, you can skip it, but if you start as a new player group, it is well invested time, that should be used to get to know each other and lineup expectatios.
I like KDE Connect quite a bit. Its a great tool to show of in front of my Windows friends and super usefull for media control.
Mindflayers are definitly evil (from humanoid perstective) because of their species. They eat and bread brains. And they are interesting.