Geopolitics is such a silly but deadly game.
Geopolitics is such a silly but deadly game.
Hope you’ve got enough whetstones to keep the blade sharp as you chop off 30% of the country’s heads.
I don’t like the fact we’re out of the EU, but you’re not going to convince that portion of the public that we’re better in the EU until the public LIVE through being outside the EU and watching them outpace us.
What’s it going to take?
I think you know the answer.
Get your guns, beans, and gasoline.
Coming soon: the freedom to be maimed by corporations cutting corners on dangerous equipment design and safety equipment provision.
Yeah no. No one is going to intervene on your private continent where there’s three guns per person. And unless those countries fancy getting friendlier with China, they’ll just hold their noses when they deal with Trump. Like they did 2016 to 2020.
You’ve got the means already; get your guns, beans, and gasoline. And if you care about American democracy, and these chuckle-fucks try to kill it, then you’re going to have to fight for it
Let’s hope it doesn’t come to that, but good luck.
Well get your guns and get your civil war over with please. The only way to fight fascists, who believe that “might makes right” and “the eternal struggle” against their enemies, is to meet them with overwhelming force.
Well good luck to you, have fun, try not to nuke the rest of the world, and let’s hope the fascists don’t win.
If you’re already making these comparisons, Biden has already lost. Get your guns, beans, and gasoline. Good luck.
“We bomb the mosque, radicalise the moderates, bring it all on!”
(Sarcastically) “Oh yeah I like it that, we take out a bunch of Muslims because they’re the real enemy! Once we’ve done that why don’t we truck-bomb a kebab shop, fly a jumbo jet into Wadge’s mum, and staple a pig to our foreheads!”
What is the bottom panel from?
From the article, talking about the complaints citing the Moms for Liberty rating system:
“Anne Frank’s Diary” and “Maus” both rate a “2” on BookLooks, with the site’s objections to the latter described as “hate involving antisemitism and racism; violence; nonsexual nudity; and mild/infrequent profanity.”
Would you look at that: non-sexual nudity, oh the shock and horror, children might learn that underneath clothes people are naked 😱
As shown by the complaint quoted in the article they’re removing these books because they discuss historical horrors, violence, and hate, therefore your argument holds no water at all.
the propaganda that is an attack on people that want to sensor books.
How is this propaganda?
Also you are completely incorrect. Those books are ABSOLUTELY are about history and learning.
Anne Frank’s Dairy is a first hand historical account of life an oppressed and genocided group under facism. Maus is another recollection of first-hand historical accounts of a polish Jew being interviewed by his son but shown visually in a cartoon graphic novel to make the context more visually palatable for a younger audience without avoiding the horrific events of history.
What next? Are you going to claim the Horrible History books are neither educational or historical as well?
Usually Nodachi and his harem.
I literally said the opposite. How did you come to that conclusion?
Um I can think of a few differences but I think the major one is that one of the geriatric fucks actually promised to end democracy in the US.
So, maybe don’t back his team?
Well if it ends up in civil war, can you at least launch the nukes and end the whole world as well, I’m kind of done being alive and going out with everyone else is probably the best excuse for not continuing on.
History is uncomfortable. Revising it to tell lovely stories is all well and good for building a national identity.
However, sugar-coating, ignoring, or even flat-out erasing parts of history benefits no one. People started writing events down accurately because the orators of old never intended paint an accurate picture of the past. And therefore lessons learnt from the failures of humanity (lost causes, preventable catastrophies, perspectives of people on the wrong side, genocides, etc.) were also lost.
History should be uncomfortable, so we can collectively learn and have a chance to do better the next time.
You do realise that there’s a version of Mien Kampf that’s four times as long because there’s several experts annotating and debunking Hitler’s ideas right there on the page.
Here’s my prediction:
Russia send the NK troops forwards in human waves, mostly under armed with all of the rusty waves. The NK troops surrender when given the chance. Russia waits for the surrendering NK troops to get the Ukrainian troops out of cover and then opens up with artillery and FPV drones on both the Ukrainian troops and NK defectors.
It’s not about what he’s trying to be remembered for, it’s just about being remembered. That’s enough: infamy.