China’s foreign minister said Saturday that Israel has gone too far in responding to last week’s invasion by Hamas, China’s official news agency reported.

Speaking to Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Israel’s actions have extended beyond self-defense.

According to Xinhua, China has an interest in helping resolve the conflict and the underlying issues involving the Palestinian population.

  • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What are you talking about? This isn’t China today, this is China in 1989 when they weren’t able to have the kind of control they do today. In fact, Tiananmen is WHY China puts all the controls they have in place today. And we can feel that’s excessive, but at least know some basic history. Jesus, if you don’t even know basic history you really are a lost cause.

    *Edit: In fact prior to Tiananmen, the west thought China was so open they were happily selling China weapons.

    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-98-171/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-98-171.pdf

    It wasn’t until after Tiananmen did they feel China was closed. And China said it had to be because of Tiananmen. So yeah, back then, not too hard to get weapons in.

      • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? I said back before 1989 the west was even shipping weapons into China, so weapons were pretty available. But they decided to stop because China cracked down and then became opaque. I don’t even know what you’re trying to say.

          • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No because it’s completely incoherent like your argument. But to answer your original point, it was much easier to access weapons in China prior to 1989. You just can’t deal with reality.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My original question was where the evidence of terrorist attacks went, not that china is a magical anti weapon zone.

              Fuck me dude, can you follow a sentence at all? Are you following a script, and Ive gone too far off your path?

              • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Where have you been? This is China’s stance on literally everything. You don’t need evidence because we are not beholden to you. That’s what they’ve said about everything from Tiananmen, to the Uyghur situation, to Jack Ma, to what Xi ate for lunch.

                Hey Jack Ma is dead right? He disappeared, and the west was going crazy as shit that they killed him. Oh but now he’s in Japan, they were wrong. And China’s response on all of that? Fuck you, it’s none of your god damn business.

                *Edit: Also 911 was an inside job right? Where’s the proof it wasn’t? And that’s why China says fuck you. Because idiots like yourself will spout nonsense no matter what anyway.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You don’t need evidence because we are not beholden to you.

                  Oops, someone tell the handler youve slipped lip a bit.

                  So, what youre saying is there were definitely terrorists but they refuse to prove it, but they had to massacre everyone there to deal with the terrorists that tooooootally were there, so it wasnt war crimes because of the evidence you definitely have but refuse to show?

                  Or in other words… Proof of a terror attack would exonerate china of the event and completely embarass all of its global rivals. Instead of rubbing everyones nose in it, they are actively hiding and suppressing any discussion of the terrorists.

                  Because they arent real. They dont exist. And if china lets that out, they have to admit they murdered their own people over nothing.

                  E: the US did loads of “inside job” investigations. They published a good deal of it. You should google it, its an interesting read

                  • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There are lots of photos of burnt out armor from the protestors attacks by western journalists.

                    Their argument is if you see those images of destroyed armor taken by foreign nationals and still think that some how China did it, well fuck you. You’re too god damn stupid to talk to.