A federal judge has struck down a California law banning gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. U.S.

California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.socialEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Speaking with 2A militants is a waste of time.

    Only because you’re so unbelievably entrenched in your opinion about the validity of a thing you seek to support it using whatever you can muster and, when that fails, you fall back on hyperbole, emotional appeal, defeatism, and insult rather than consider that you may be putting your conclusion before any support.

    I’ve quoted statistics, scientific studies, framed 2A in founder’s terms (that’s actually a reference you’ve ignored completely)

    I seem to have missed those - were they in the form of hyperbolic bullshit? You have provided quite a bit of that.

    ETA: Feel free to highlight where you’ve done so.

    so let’s skip to the end, finish with your snark and smugness, and walk away.

    I see you’re working on your projection.

    You don’t give a fuck about it as long as you can buy your gun.

    I’d argue I care about the issues at hand far more given my arguments for actually addressing those issues rather than taking offense a specific tool is used to the neglect of the actual suffering.

    But hey, don’t let that get in the way of your narrative. You seem to be concocting quite the substitute for reality.