Abstract

The polarized reaction to the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO in December 2024 underscored the potential of ideologically framed acts of violence to undermine societal cohesion and challenge democratic norms. While many condemned the killing as an unjustifiable attack on a private citizen, others celebrated Mangione as a “folk hero,” glorifying him and his act as a symbol of resistance against an industry perceived as corrupt and dehumanizing. Using data from a rolling cross-sectional survey in the U.S., we causally tested partisan differences in support for political violence before and after the CEO’s assassination and the perpetrator’s subsequent arrest. While Democrats initially condemned violence against Republicans, their support for partisan violence increased following Mangione’s arrest. These results underscore the role of public discourse in shaping attitudes towards political violence, raising concerns about the normalization of politically motivated aggression, even among groups traditionally less inclined to endorse it.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    “Polarized”? I can’t recall anything since 9/11 that has united left and right as much as this event.

    Oh, you mean polarized the rich from the poor.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s what happened. Conservative and right leaning people are calling for the death penalty for mangione and for him to be made an example of. They’re. Fully against him and everything he allegedly did.

      • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The front-facing pundits, maybe. On the ground, if you strip away the MAGA cult there is some understanding that the wealthy are fucking over everyone else, even if the conclusions drawn from that are confused and distorted. And it’s not like we’re talking about pacifists disgusted by violence here. “Rich Men North of Richmond” didn’t come from nowhere.

        • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          If you go to any right leaning or conservative forum, you’ll easily see that right wingers hate the guy and chalk him up as “saviour of the left”. I don’t buy that he’s created unity for a second.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah, but if you go anywhere on the fediverse he’s the biggest hero since the last person who did one big thing that ultimately had no real effect on the world, and who needs to look elsewhere for bipartisan opinions?

            • Krono@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              And if you go anywhere outside of the Fediverse, pro-Mangioni voices are removed and banned.

              Corporate censorship on other platforms has made the Fediverse into an outlier on this subject, and then sadly people like you capitulate to the narrative that Mangioni is unpopular in those censored spaces.