• Astro@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Authoritarian Leftists seems to be an oxymoron

    Edit: I meant sounds like; I’m super dumb lol. Thanks for educating me on what it actually means :)

    • Kata1yst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Liberalism and authoritarianism are opposites just like progressivism and conservatism are.

      For historical (and arguably nefarious) reasons Western society has largely lumped liberalism and progressivism into “Left” and authoritarianism and conservatism into “Right”.

      But this ignores the reality that you can have progressive authoritarians (Stalinists/Maoists), and liberal conservatives (Libertarians).

      • Slotos@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Either you’re using a definition of “progressive” that doesn’t relate to progressivism, or we’re looking at some very different definitions of Stalinism.

        Stalinism was never about improvement of human societies. One could argue that Trotskyism was at least pretending to (it’s incredibly hard to attribute real humanitarian intent to anything bolsheviks did, once you look closer at their methods), but Stalinism was unabashedly explicit about seizing control and shutting down dissent. It embraced Russian Empire’s secret police approach and was closer to early Muscovite monarchism, with a despot deciding who gets to enjoy privileges and control, than to anything progressive.

        • Kata1yst@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What you’re talking about is the “authoritarian” part of the progressive authoritarian equation.

          As the opposite of conservatism, progressivism is about societal advancement, elevating the average well being in the country, which on it’s face Communism is explicitly about. Or are you arguing that Stalinist Communism was conservative, trying to uphold the values of the historical ruling power structures?

          • Slotos@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Authoritarianism explicitly opposes political action, attempting to eradicate it entirely. Progressivism is rooted in it.

            Conservatism is not defined by “upholding the values of the historical ruling power structures”. A dog being wet doesn’t make everything that’s wet a dog.

            Stalinism in practice was extremely backwards, ironically anti-communist, and conservative with its strict vertical power structure (traditional for Russian empire) and promotion of Russian nationalism (Stalin explicitly names Russians as “elder brothers of soviet people”). Stalin’s authoritarian approach also agrees with conservatives’ preference for strict social order models. Political activism was persecuted under Stalin in the same manner - and often by the same people - it was persecuted in Russian empire.

            The founding myth of the empire - “Kyiv is the mother of Russian cities and Russia is the Rus” was not only preserved, but actively maintained through any means possible. Can’t get more conservative than that.