And the difference between bad billionaires and “good” billionaires in their eyes? The “good” ones give the dems money, and the bad ones don’t.
It makes it very easy for them to say they’ll never take money from the bad billionaires.
we may have to start making excuses for the lack of terror
Democrats committing political suicide is good. That party is a dead end and hurts left wing movements by diverting them.
I can’t wait for the day some libsky user understands the difference between a leftist and liberal
This guy looks like one of the stock photos the onion would use
A Bluesky thread of the post
https://subium.com/profile/kenklippenstein.bsky.social/post/3lh5lucffj22i
Libs are mad. A reply
My God, what a cuck.
Also - his voice is at least 5 times as bad as you think.
Wait, even the libs are mad at that comment? Interesting. I didn’t expect that.
Why do people in a community full of radicalized individuals genuinely believe radicalization is impossible?
The DNC motto is “Better things aren’t possible” so it’s just surprising to see.
It’s not the DNC radicalizing, just normal libs who are developing political consciousness due to sharpening contradictions. It’s exactly what Marxists should know to anticipate.
Ditto.
I assume it’s like the “white guy voice” from Sorry to Bother You
Please define the difference between good and bad billionaires, Ken. Is it simple the ones who will give you money and the ones who won’t?
I really hope Luigi and this slap in the face gets people to see the writing on the wall and abandon these scumfucks. Join a local org and stop falling for liberal bullshit.
I’m going to become the joker.
The only people who come closest to standing in the GOP’s way is a party that’s essentially a GOP fanclub.
lmao
Yeah this is such a weird thing to say
not for a dem
Good, another blow to the progressive kayfabe
How is this any different from what they’ve been saying and doing already?
This is your brain on capitalism
Pack it up, they haven’t learned a thing. And they never will.
