Image is of Assad’s presidential palace in 2013. There’s more images of it in this article, though the words in it aren’t worth reading.


Here is Assad’s version of events. I like to imagine he’s making one of those Youtuber apology videos where they sigh at the start and talk in a chastised yet somewhat defensive tone of voice.

As terrorism spread across Syria and ultimately reached Damascus on the evening of Saturday 7th December 2024, questions arose about the president’s fate and whereabouts. This occurred amidst a flood of misinformation and narratives far removed from the truth, aimed at recasting international terrorism as a liberation revolution for Syria.

At such a critical juncture in the nation’s history, where truth must take precedence, it is essential to address these distortions. Unfortunately, the prevailing circumstances at the time, including a total communication blackout for security reasons, delayed the release of this statement. This does not replace a detailed account of the events that unfolded, which will be provided when the opportunity allows.

First, my departure from Syria was neither planned nor did it occur during the final hours of the battles, as some have claimed. On the contrary, I remained in Damascus, carrying out my duties until the early hours of Sunday 8th December 2024. As terrorist forces infiltrated Damascus, I moved to Latakia in co-ordination with our Russian allies to oversee combat operations. Upon arrival at the Hmeimim airbase that morning, it became clear that our forces had completely withdrawn from all battle lines and that the last army positions had fallen. As the field situation in the area continued to deteriorate, the Russian military base itself came under intensified attack by drone strikes.

With no viable means of leaving the base, Moscow requested that the base’s command arrange an immediate evacuation to Russia on the evening of Sunday 8th December. This took place a day after the fall of Damascus following the collapse of the final military positions and the resulting paralysis of all remaining state institutions.

At no point during these events did I consider stepping down or seeking refuge, nor was such a proposal made by any individual or party. The only course of action was to continue fighting against the terrorist onslaught.

I reaffirm that the person who, from the very first day of the war, refused to barter the salvation of his nation for personal gain, or to compromise his people in exchange for numerous offers and enticements is the same person who stood alongside the officers and soldiers of the army on the front lines, just metres from terrorists in the most dangerous and intense battlefields. He is the same person who, during the darkest years of the war, did not leave but remained with his family alongside his people, confronting terrorism under bombardment and the recurring threats of terrorist incursions into the capital over 14 years of war. Furthermore, the person who has never abandoned the resistance in Palestine and Lebanon, nor betrayed his allies who stood by him, cannot possibly be the same person who would forsake his own people or betray the army and nation to which he belongs.

I have never sought positions for personal gain but have always considered myself as a custodian of a national project, supported by the faith of the Syrian people, who believed in its vision. I have carried an unwavering conviction in their will and ability to protect the state, defend its institutions, and uphold their choices to the very last moment.

When the state falls into the hands of terrorism and the ability to make a meaningful contribution is lost, any position becomes void of purpose, rendering its occupation meaningless. This does not, in any way, diminish my profound sense of belonging to Syria and her people – a bond that remains unshaken by any position or circumstance. It is a belonging filled with hope that Syria will once again be free and independent.


Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


    • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Dumb question - what happens when there is no growth left/needed by the chinese people? Right now, any growth is good as it allows them to alleviate poverty, but eventually all chinese citizens will have a good standard of living. Does China value growth above all else, or will they eventually work to prioritize automation and lessen working hours?

      This wont come until the middle of the century, but i fear a scenario where foreign investment grows to much and neoliberalism has a stranglehold on China. When the population is out of poverty, infrastructure is solid, and net zero is reached, China can focus on moving towards achieving communism above all else. As we know, the neoliberal reliance on GDP growth would make a transition to communism impossible and economic crisis inevitable.

        • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I am a dumb idiot that doesnt understand how money works. But here is my basic meaning by “no growth needed”

          When every chinese citizen is in a comfortable home. All commodities and energy necessary for domestic consumption are produced sustainably with zero emissions. There is a set amount of work left to do annually (maintaining infrastructure, producing those commodities) but as time goes on the labor hours required to meet domestic consumption needs continues to reduce. In this scenario, you are saying China needs to maintain export surpluses to keep their cash reserves as needed. But isnt the end goal of CCP to achieve communism? And at this point why wouldnt they be transitioning towards true communism? Why would pension funds be needed when housing, food, and healthcare can be guaranteed to every citizen? Why would they continue to export, other than the required amount to get goods and raw materials that cant be gotten domestically

    • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      There’s no way this happens right? The national security state seems committed to confrontation with China and while the CPC has only met USAmerican provocation with a limited response, there’s no way they will be ready to “get back under the boot” (which presumably will be a condition in some concrete form) surely

    • geikei [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Your thing has become somewhat more difficult since at least with Biden we could give the benifit of the doupt that there were 4d chess plays from his administration behind the scenes and that the words of said administration were subbtle push and pull messages to foreign powers. Now you get to do KremlinWashingtonology with random parts of Trump brainfart ramblings to connect them to hidden empire checkmates. With Trump not only masterfully teasing the US geopolitical moves, offers and threats in his speeches but presumably building an administration that can even see them through. I dont envy you

      Just a note. US is ~3% of FDI in China… in good years, FDI is ~4% total investment in China, <2% of GDP for a decade now. (Some of the FDI from HK SAR is also partly from the US, taking a detour to the mainland over HK but still) Im sure China is dismantling one of the pillars of its monetary and economic policy in capital controls in defeat as we speak to get that life saving American FDI. All the signs are there, after all the CPC has announced that “they welcome and urge foreign investment and US cooperation and will try to make the enviroment easier for it” for the 5000th time since reform and opening up

        • geikei [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          That small % of FDI in proportion to GDP is responsible for 16% of China’s tax revenues and nearly 30% (!!) of China’s export value!

          The 16% number is for FIE of all venture configurations and country sources , not just the US which is a small minority of total investment. And capital and revenues of FIE of any short =/= FDI to begin with which is what you mentioned. Also FDI in high tech sectors is at ~10% of total for 2024 but the increase came from non US sources ,is still only 10% and is hillarously dawrfed by China’s domestic investment. If we are going to be pulling stats and facts that are only tangentialy true you are better of watching Trumps Joe Rogan episode and search for hints on how he plans on solidifying US dollar hegemony