• zagaberoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Talk to me when it’s all battery and no gas. That’s what nuclear would be replacing, not the renewables. Nuclear and solar/wind complement each other.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nuclear and solar/wind complement each other

      Not at all. Nuclear’s terrible at ramping up for short term loads like in-fill gaps. Gas can be idle most of the time and then fired up as required. You don’t want to be relying on it most of the time but for in-fill it’s cheaper and better than nuclear.

      • zagaberoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So your grand plan is to keep carbon emitting sources until batteries can completely cover the baseload in all conditions? That’s a non-solution.

        Batteries, limited as they are, can certainly mitigate ramping issues with nuclear, though.

        • zik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, that’s not it. Ultimately a mix of renewables will replace everything. Add say tidal and pumped hydro plus maybe some geothermal etc. and you don’t need any non-renewable energy sources.