The Securities and Exchange Commission intends to seek sanctions against Elon Musk over his failure to appear for testimony in an investigation related to his takeover of Twitter, now called X, the regulator said in a court filing Friday.

Earlier this year, a federal judge ordered Musk to testify as part of the SEC’s probe of the billionaire’s $44 billion acquisition. The agency is examining whether Musk followed the law when disclosing his purchases of Twitter stock and whether his statements in relation to the deal were misleading.

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s above the law until they can hold him accountable for his actions. They either need to admit that he is- or prove he isn’t.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just like Trump- even when it looks like there will be consequences, there will be no consequences.

    • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      149
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would literally be shocked if they enforced a rule that everyone else has to follow on a celebrity billionaire

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not sure what the law is on this. But from a practical standpoint, I would like to see adverse inferences drawn against him because he failed to show. That would form the basis for massive fines, so assess those fines, and take away a ton of his money.

      It doesn’t seem like there’s any need to put him behind bars when this is a question about doing shady things with money that can be handled by taking away a lot of his cash.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is not unusual in alimony or child support cases for someone who refuses to pay what they owe to be locked up for contempt. It is a way of compelling obedience to the law in civil cases.

      • answer42@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        So what should be the fine? 100 billion? Even with that less he would still be one of the richest persons

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              You mean he doesn’t have a Scrooge McDuck style room filled with dollar bills that he goes swimming in?

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s the FAA. The SEC could halt Trading in Tesla, spaceX and other musk companies while they investigate irregularities.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Taking action against unrelated companies isn’t typically allowed.

        The SECs quarrel is with Elon and Twitter and has nothing to do with his other companies.

        However, much like his 420 tweet where they were able to have him resign as chair of Tesla, they could probably do something with sanctions that target him specifically, like disallow him from being on the board of a public company.

        But that’s about as direct of an impact as they could have on the other companies.

  • Bilb!A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not showing up? I hope he’s okay. 😟

    Wow, talk about a genius! His innovations are truly changing the world. I’m so grateful for his vision and drive to make the impossible possible. He’s a real inspiration to us all! Thanks for everything, Elon!