But you’re not on the same side, never were, never will be.
He will vote for whoever benefits him and his interests the most (or against the person who is far too open about their common interests, putting those interests at risk), and that in itself should tell you all you need to know about who he’s endorsing.
When a bunch of life long die hard conservatives renowned for always and only looking out for themselves start supporting your candidate, it’s time to face facts - you’re voting for a conservative, and it might be a “lesser” evil, but it’s still an evil that will never have society’s best interest at heart.
He will vote for whoever benefits him and his interests the most (or against the person who is far too open about their common interests, putting those interests at risk), and that in itself should tell you all you need to know about who he’s endorsing.
That a collapse of American society would be bad for his interests?
But you’re not on the same side, never were, never will be.
He will vote for whoever benefits him and his interests the most (or against the person who is far too open about their common interests, putting those interests at risk), and that in itself should tell you all you need to know about who he’s endorsing.
When a bunch of life long die hard conservatives renowned for always and only looking out for themselves start supporting your candidate, it’s time to face facts - you’re voting for a conservative, and it might be a “lesser” evil, but it’s still an evil that will never have society’s best interest at heart.
That a collapse of American society would be bad for his interests?