• Filthmontane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    That’s dumb. If you think the greens are just as bad as the Dems, then your brain is broken. PSL has ballot access in 17 states and they’re the only other leftists running a candidate. Green party has more ballot access in 37 states and holds a significantly higher chance of meaning anything. But maybe in another 3 or 4 election cycles the PSL will have the ballot access that the greens do now.

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      I didn’t say the greens are as bad as the dems, I said they’re not the best available option any more than dems are.

      Im not gonna rake you over the coals too much for it, but maybe the language around ballot access and chances isn’t the best way to pull people to your particular electoral construction given it’s the same set of ideas that supporters of the democrats are using against both of us.

      • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        They use that argument because it’s valid and holds weight. The only other option besides bringing in a third party with ballot access is violent revolution and that was a lot cooler of an idea before drones existed.

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          If it’s so valid then why aren’t you voting democrat?

          My problem with the idea that we all ought to vote for some party whose policies and politics are far from our own in order to win isn’t that it denies the blossoming of everyone’s special flower ideas, but that it collapses all the effects of a third party into winning and losing.