• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    How many thousands of women and children were simply LIVING in their homes when Israel voluntarily and with full knowledge of their civilian presence dropped a 1,000lb JDAM on them to eliminate a singular HAMAS target or two?

    Look I’m voting for Harris but I really, really dislike how she goes into explicit detail on the events of October 7th but doesn’t go into explicit detail on Palestinians crushed, decapitated, blown in half or to bits by explosives, maimed, shot, and yes sometimes raped by IDF.

    This double-standard of evocative imagery is in itself pretty disturbing.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      How many thousands of women and children were simply LIVING in their homes when Israel voluntarily and with full knowledge of their civilian presence dropped a 1,000lb JDAM on them to eliminate a singular HAMAS target or two?

      Fuck the men that didn’t want to die, I guess

      • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Women and children are generally given as examples because they’re widely perceived as unambiguously not combatants compared to men by most people.

        Nobody’s saying "fuck the men that didn’t want to die". If someone says "how many women and girls were simply living their lives when they were sexually assaulted" and your immediate and only response is "so what, no one cares about men and boys who were sexually assaulted?", can you see why that’s kind of a nonsensical conclusion to make?

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Exactly. Pretty obvious because it leaves no low-hanging fruit for an Israeli apologist to say something like, “those men were probably Hamas.”

          It just makes for a more tight and rhetorically effective argument.

  • Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    And there it is, colors shown true.

    The US is an oligarchy in everything but name. The average voter doesn’t want this policy, but that’s not what matters for Harris. That’s not what matters in an oligarchy.

    What matters is the few with means, not most.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If this bothers you then vote for some candidate and party other than Harris and the dems.

    I like PSL.

    • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why can’t we just vote for the biggest leftist party with the most ballot access? Ya know, the green party

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I will generally not recommend people vote for or support the greens because they represent a directionless triangulation with no vision.

        I’ve had the opportunity to vote green in every national election they’ve been in and even chosen them a few times and they’ve always let me down.

        • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s that kind of attitude that weakens the left. If every leftist were involved with the greens, we could create a truly revolutionary party.

          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            perhaps by changing the party into something entirely different from within. of course that would require a lot of work to overcome 25 years of institutional inertia, let alone a big job of completely changing the party’s strategy and operation.

            i would even make the argument that the greens aren’t left, since they aren’t calling for worker control of the means of production and historically that’s been the bare minimum to be considered left but using the french seating chart hundreds of years later has its own issues.

            • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well I don’t see nearly as much ballot access from the PSL or any other minor party. Maybe we should make a new party that’ll lose popularity to the next one in 5 years. No party will ever be leftist enough for leftists in this country and that pretentious mindset will keep us weak forever.

              • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                How does that saying go? “If ballot access were candy and nuts we’d all be eating steak!”

                There are absolutely ultras in America but it’s not a position necessary to recognize that the Green Party isn’t leftist. I’d say at the very least the greens can’t be called leftist for the same reason the dubious moniker “progressive” isn’t any marker of the same: their platform is explicitly not left.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        propaganda from both parties keep people at the bottom of the juice pitcher unable to breath fresh air and there are too few not drinking the punch to do anything

        huge crab effect going on here

        like when you go crabbing and put all the crabs in the bucket and the crabs that almost get out get stopped by their peers

  • shaiatan@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The number of “left” voters in this community that are doing their damnedest to get Trump elected never ceases to disturb me.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The number of pro-genocide centrists who accuse anyone who doesn’t love genocide as much as they do of being trumpers will never surprise me.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Saying they are “pro-genocide” is beyond hyperbolic.

        These type of extreme, over the top comments hurt way more than help.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          These type of extreme, over the top comments hurt way more than help.

          Hurt what? The tender fee-fee’s of pro-genocide centrists? If they don’t want to be called pro-genocide, they should stop supporting genocide. If they don’t want to be called pro-genocide, they should stand firm on literally any other issue. But they fucking don’t. Everything else is up for negotiation. Everything else is fertile ground for capitulation. Not genocide. That’s the only thing centrists won’t budge on.

          • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            damn right

            Harris could easily at this point make her own platform to run on that includes what the voters are asking for

            her refusal to acknowledge the voters’ concerns is very telling

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    US support for genocide, regardless of the country of origin. Is going to end badly. Trump supports Russia, The dems support Israel. No matter who you pick, some defenseless group of people is going to pay the price for your vote. Atrocious.

    • FrankFrankson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Trump has said multiple times he has unwavering support of Israel and would give them even more weapons. Harris might be pushing the status quo which sucks but Trump would do much worse. I mean fuck Trump moved the US embassy to Jerusalem and recognized Israel’s claim to the Golan Heights. Trump already dunped a shit ton of fuel on the fire of war down there. Saying the two of them are both the same is some bullshit false equivalency crap. Get educated on a topic before you decide to barf out stupid comments.

    • 8uurg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Trump supports Russia and Israel, the dems support Israel. If you pick Trump, both groups pay the price. Depending on who you pick one group will pay the price or not, one group will pay the price no matter what; yet for this group (the Palestinians) the degree to which will probably differ, I suspect Trump may be worse given that he avoids supporting a ceasefire at all and tells the Israeli government to finish what they started. People from Palestine state the same: Trump would be worse, but neither choice would support them.

      • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be clear though, the dems aren’t supporting a genocide, they’re supporting Israel to keep Iran from running roughshot through the middle east. They’re doing more than the rest of the world is by at least trying to negotiate a ceasefire. Better than writing finish them with a sharpie on the bombs.