• Klear@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Non-American here. I also didn’t get this, thinking it’s just puritanical bullshit. Some Americans seem obsessed with auto-censorship.

    Anyway, I finally understood while watching Django Unchained. It’s an extremely dehumanising word, meant to separate people (who have rights) from things which do not. It’s a tool to be able to do this distinction and then do unspeakable evil to specific people because they don’t count as people and so it’s alright.

    Now remember that slavery was ended* only relatively recently, segregation was a thing during the lifetimes of many people and this mindset of black people not being even human is still prevalent…

    The word is meant to be always used in hostility and it’s still being used like that today. That’s why you want to steer clear of it.

    • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think a lot of the conflict around the word is centered on the fact that many black people use it (obviously without the hard r) in casual reference to other people, often even people that aren’t black. It’s essentially become equivalent to “dude” or “brother”. So some people don’t see how it’s wrong to use it in that context even if you aren’t black.

      I’m not saying I agree, mind you. I’m just making an observation

    • loudwhisper@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Django Unchained

      Isn’t it ironic that a movie with so many uses of that word helped you understand that word better?

      To me it seems a very good reason to believe that people shouldn’t be afraid of the syntax of the word, but definitely oppose the use when the semantic is the despicable one.