This woman IS deranged. It’s hilarious that she’s demanding a timetable for anything from anyone and assuming she is a person of any consequence.

  • Xifeh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    If he was dead, wouldn’t the result be the same?Kamala would take over the ticket. What would be the point of hiding it?

    • Timii@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      The result would be Mike Johnson is the probable next in line to the president with Harris acting as president. This would give MAGA and those Trump have asked to ‘stand back and stand by’ months to ‘find a way’ to get Johnson in as president for the election and certification period.

      The more obvious and plausible reason is they just want something, ANYTHING, that gets them a news bite.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        With this SCOTUS I would not put it past them to say “actually the constitution meant to say we need 60 Republicans to impeach a president and they can be anyone not just senators. We pulled this from the myass papers”

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wait. Her big idea right now is Weekend at Bernie’s, the White House edition?

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If he were dead, she would assume the remainder of his term and only be eligible for one of her own. The only way this argument makes sense is if they are scared they are going to lose and don’t want an incumbent in the next election.

      I was wrong. See all the replies.

      They aren’t kidding that the quickest way to get a right answer on the internet is to post a wrong one.

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s not true actually. She would have to be president for 2 or more years in that scenario. So she could have been pres for 1.9 years already and still eligible for 2 more terms.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not true- she can serve 2 full terms, plus up to half of a term if she were to assume the remainder.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Really? I didn’t know that. That’s great. Other than he’s not dead so it doesn’t matter, but still I didn’t mean to misinform.

      • Thrashy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Not even that. The 22nd Amendment states that a person can only be elected to the office twice, unless they’ve served two or more years of somebody’s else’s term, in which case they can only be elected once. Five months away from the next inauguration, it would change nothing if Harris had to take over the Presidency for some reason.

      • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        This isn’t true, though.

        No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

        Since she’s inside the window of two years, it would not count as a first term.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t believe that would affect her two terms. The 22 amendment talks how many times a person can be elected to be a president.