• ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    My “true tax rate” is a low single digit number too, if you measure it the same way, and I make ~$50k a year.

    It’s extremely disingenuous to talk about taxes paid as a percentage of income, and as a percentage of total wealth/net worth, in the same breath, as if they are anywhere near the same thing.

    It’s also extremely disingenuous to say someone is ‘avoiding tax’ by not paying tax on their unrealized gains in net worth. He doesn’t OWE any tax on that. NOBODY in the US does.

    This is like calling someone a draft dodger, who was never drafted, lol.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 months ago
        • Property taxes are not levied federally, but on the state level
        • Buffett pays property tax too

        Not sure what point you were trying to make here, lol. There is no type of unrealized gain that “normal people” are taxed on (federally or otherwise), but Buffett isn’t.

        • AlotOfReading@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I had hoped the point would be pretty obvious. Most people’s homes represent a significant part of their net worth, often a majority of their assets. The unrealized gains on that are taxed.

          Billionaires generally (are there even any counterexamples?) do not have the majority of their net worth stored in assets that are taxed the same way. It’s a meaningful difference.

          • deathbird@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            It is kinda weird that real estate gets taxed just for existing and being held, but stocks, which supposedly represent a fraction of a mass of real wealth too, don’t get taxed while just being held.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            are there even any counterexamples?

            Actually, there are a large number of billionaires whose primary assets are literally property.

            https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacomotognini/2023/10/04/the-richest-real-estate-billionaires-in-america-2023/

            I had hoped the point would be pretty obvious. Most people’s homes represent a significant part of their net worth, often a majority of their assets. The unrealized gains on that are taxed.

            But the real question is, do you think they should be? 'Cause I’m with you if you say no. Unrealized gains should not be taxed at all, it makes no sense.

            • AlotOfReading@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              You’re misunderstanding how their wealth is distributed. By and large, they’re not directly owning the land and paying taxes. They just own significant stakes in the actual companies holding property. I’m sure they own a house or three, but it’s not significant compared to their other assets.

              I’m not taking a position on whether property taxes are good. I think they are. I’m just pointing out the discrepancy.