cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15001340

“Such an invasion could lead to horrific massacres and raise scenarios of a second Nakba,” the Gaza-based Palestinian Center for Human Rights said recently. “After 200 days of horrific genocidal acts in Gaza, the real objectives of the attack are the continuation of the 76-year-long ongoing Nakba and the erasure and genocidal destruction of the Palestinian people in Gaza. Israel is laying the groundwork to fulfill its settler-colonial plan of colonizing Gaza.”

Human rights defenders have warned that Israel may ultimately seek to ethnically cleanse as many Palestinians as possible from Gaza.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
    52·
    6 months ago

    What you are saying is its ok for a news organization to push one side of a story, report only stories that support their views, use language that makes it seem more urgent and serious than it actually is, and this is a reputable organization that should be listed to?

    To a greater or lesser degree, all news orgs do this.

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldEnglish
      32·
      6 months ago

      Yes, most organizations lean one way or another.

      The issue I’ve got is that this discussion seems to be saying that it should be celebrated as the be all and end all of this conflict, that you should only be looking at organizations that support your view, and that you shouldn’t look into what bias your organizations is pushing without further analysis and understanding.

      Effectively, that it’s more important your views are confirmed than you are informed and accurate.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
        22·
        6 months ago

        Effectively, that it’s more important your views are confirmed than you are informed and accurate.

        Who is saying that though? I’m certainly not.