• schroedingershat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re deliberately trying to conflate the time from before-site-selection to a finished plant with the time for finishing a particular reactor after ground breaking. An analogy would be claiming the average time for a solar plant is three minutes because screwing one panel on takes that long.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or maybe there are actual studies considering all nuclear power plants built so a mean actually means something. But anti-nuclear people never were about actual facts I guess.

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which are just as legit as all the studies that show how great oil, coal and gas are, and are peddled by the same peoe using the same methods.

        Show me your study showing that the average time for a gen III or later plant is finished in 7.5 years from the time where sites are being assessed.