• thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Here’s what I’m still struggling to grasp:

    If you plan a robbery and you’re the getaway driver and your partner inside the building kills someone, both of you get charged with murder. Every person who was behind the barricades on January 6 and helped plan the coup online was committing the same crime and people died. Why aren’t they all being charged with murder?

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why aren’t they all being charged with murder?

      It’s probably something to do with how much coordination and planning go into the crime, and how closely associated these perpetraitors were.

    • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      52
      ·
      9 months ago

      > If you plan a robbery and you’re the getaway driver and your partner inside the building kills someone, both of you get charged with murder. Every person who was behind the barricades on January 6 and helped plan the coup online was committing the same crime and people died. Why aren’t they all being charged with murder?

      because they werent planning a coup or committing a crime. i know this is really hard for liberals to understand but the people who stormed the capitol that day are patriots.

      this isn’t to say i agree with them. i abhor patriots. but these people believe the constitution is good, and america is good, and they got cheated. they are wrong on all three counts. but they’re not criminals and it wasn’t a coup.

              • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                9 months ago

                Refute that they aren’t criminals and are just patriots? Their actions do that. They came prepared to take hostages. They came to cause wanton destruction. They assaulted police, broke down barriers, and threatened to kill people.

                Patriots. Pfft. Pawns at least and conspirators and traitors at worst.

                Not like you are actually here for discourse.

                • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  >They came prepared to take hostages.

                  some people might have. there is no way such a conspiracy was know to all the people in the crowd though, or even all those who entered the building.

                • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  > They assaulted police, broke down barriers, and threatened to kill people.

                  most of the people in the crowd did none of that, and it surpasses reason to suppose that they chose to be a part of such a crowd with premeditation.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          9 months ago

          since there have been laws, there have been criminals.

          i can concede that some of their conduct violated laws, but i disagree with doing very little of it. i don’t agree with the people or their motives, but i think it’s fine to walk through the peoples house and be rowdy.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        In the civil war, both sides thought they were patriots. Clearly they both were not correct.

        One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. In the case of Jan 6th, the whole point was to subvert the legally voted president and install a president who was not legally elected.

        If you supported the candidate, you might agree with them being president but subverting democracy and the process is the issue. That’s a coup.

        That’s the part the right misses. It’s not a case of bad luck let’s use all means to correct it. It’s subverting the whole legal and democratic system.

        It’s dangerous for all of our freedoms. People not having a strong opinions hat trump should be in jail is crazy to anyone paying attention.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          locking people in cages is bad.

          laws are bad.

          but I don’t expect liberals to agree with me any more than I expect Republicans.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Laws are bad. Lol

            You may have saved us all the bother and just told us you don’t understand how society works. Even libertarians understand that you need laws to codify their impractical beliefs.

      • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        No one that showed up to Trump’s rally on J6 or went to the capital afterward arrived in DC for a bake sale, meet and greet, speed dating or any other such thing. They arrived there to make Trump president any way they could, including insurrection. They may not have put “Do a coup/insurrection” on their daily to do lists but even the densest dullard on J6 knew that was the endgame.

        The only patriots on J6 were those capital police who did their best to stop the insurrectionists, and thankfully succeeded. Those are the patriots. To twist, whitewash or rebrand the insurrectionists as “misguided patriots just trying to be good Americans” is disgusting.

        Now these “patriots”, as you want to call them, are floating this red Caesar crap and making Trump dictator of America. They want to end the last vestiges of democracy in America and you to call them “patriots”.

        It is honestly hard to tell if you are a troll, idiot, poor excuse for a propagandist or all three. Regardless your opion isn’t just wrong it’s shit.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          > It is honestly hard to tell if you are a troll, idiot, poor excuse for a propagandist or all three

          personal attacks are uncivil

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          >The only patriots on J6 were those capital police who did their best to stop the insurrectionists, and thankfully succeeded.

          >Pretty sure my hate meter is maxed for cops

          pick one

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          >They arrived there to make Trump president any way they could, including insurrection. They may not have put “Do a coup/insurrection” on their daily to do lists but even the densest dullard on J6 knew that was the endgame.

          what is your evidence for this?

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        No. When you storm the capital, it’s an attempted coup. What else could it possibly be? A sudden use of threats and actual violence to seize power.

        Of course some coups might be justified, sure sure, that’s a value judgement. And still, the words all mean what they ordinarily mean.

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They believe the constitution is good the same way evangelicals believe in following the Bible.

        It’s a buffet that they can pick and choose from to find justification for their own internal biases to impose on others while ignoring the parts that would cause them to become better people.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          maybe. i think everyone sort of does that. i’ve decided to just not treat it as anything other than a scrap of paper, but sometimes i think it’s pithy to quote parts of it.

          • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            There’s a bit of a difference though between:

            “I like cheeseburgers.” And “Maybe we ought to kill a couple legislators if we don’t get our way.”

            I could be wrong though.

            • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              cheeseburgers aren’t in the constitution, but there is a bit about the right of the people to keep and bear arms that a lot of democrats seem to overlook, and of course the entire 9th and 10th amendment get trampled pretty often. i think the 4th and 5th amendments are just kept around for posterity. even the enumerated powers of congress are ignored when the president wants to start a war.

              what i’m saying is that the accusation of picking and choosing is correct, but that doesn’t disqualify them as patriots.

              • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                But they are in the Bible, hence my point. Weird how the recent the current interpretation of the second amendment is about the unfettered rights of arms and acceptable places. That wasn’t held up when tried closer to when the people who wrote it were still living.

                • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  frankly, i don’t believe in rights at all, and i think the whole sham that anyone actually governs according to the document ought to be exposed for what it is, so i don’t actually care about the text. i’m saying that everyone who claims to care about it picks and chooses.

            • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              no one credibly tried to kill any legislators tho.

              and some of the rhetoric i’ve seen about legislators who support the j6ers indicate that this isn’t a matter of one side feeling absolutely justified an any actions they think are necessary to deal with traitors, if you catch my drift.