• serinus@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The “unfortunately” is weird. The judge is supposed to interpret law, not decide it. And he’s determined that this law conflicts with inalienable rights in another law for a particular reason.

        I understand people think it’s not broad enough, but more specific is more defensible, and more likely to stick.