• IntoDaLagoon@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Straight up planning colonialism. Just when I naively thought the mask was already as off as it was gonna be for a little while.

    • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      The euros do have an obsession with redrawing territory lines don’t they. I guess they think they’ll be out of practice if they don’t do it constantly.

  • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine some Chinese dude saying crap like this

    ‘Yeah, so we want to divide Europe in 84 new regions’

    Mayonaise colored people would have a meltdown

  • Kirbywithwhip1987@lemmygrad.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    So when is Mexico getting 10 states back, Argentina some islands, 40 new countries become independent+ a few more island countries, 3 more in UK, and another few more in Spain and 2 in Belgium etc?

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, they kind of did in 1991. What was the situation in USA or Germany before they got access to USSR’s resources? Not just natural resources mind, but people as well. Technologies. Straight up money

  • SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Libs be like commies are fascists and then go on to constantly propose breaking up socialist countries into literal ethnostates

  • Anatolianin@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes, they don’t even bother about borders, they just divide them by administrative districts.

    I think those decolonizators still will not be satisfied with the amount of conflicts, deaths and poverty to which such a division will lead

  • aleshasmiles@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m terrible at vexillology so idk what most of those flags are, but the one on the green state is literally just a US flag

    • MinekPo1 [She/Her]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Turns out this is a bit of a rabbit hole! Despite that flag being used by the Free Nations of PostRussia Forum, I’ve not been able to find the exact version of the flag they use. From this image, I’ve been able to get the name of the proposed nation - Соедененные Штаты Сибири, which translates to the United States of Syberia. I have been unable to find any English, non fictional sources in English, but I have found one in Russian (though hosted on a server in the US), here. Quotes (translated by google translate, with some editorial oversight by me):

      The United States of Siberia is a non-existent hypothetical (under development and project) federal independent liberal democratic state of Rashki [Russia], which many of its supporters for “free Siberia” supposedly to quietly develop independently and no longer feed Muscovy [Moscow], Chechnya and all the other freeloaders.

      [Section] Separation from Faggots [derogatory for Russians?]

      On Rasey [Russia], many are surprised. Why would it be some fascist commies in the Scoop [USSR].

      This is only a small selection of what is present on the site.

      It seems the flag the folks at the FNPRF used looks something like this (with a extra stripe?)

      However, curiously, there have been semi-successful (?) though short-lived separatist movements in the area, establishing a Siberian Republic in 1918, in the aftermath of the Febuary revolution, which (at least according to wikipedia), have used this flag:

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Siberian Republic in 1918

        It was short lived SR attempt, ended promptly and pathetically deep into the colon of Kolchak and local landowners, beautifically proving Lenin warning that SR’s are just reactionaries.

        • MinekPo1 [She/Her]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was an attempt however, which is what is relevant in this context as by this it is far more legitimate than the group FNPRF decided to use, which speaks about the legitimacy of this organization.

      • Anatolianin@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The United States of Siberia is a non-existent hypothetical (under development and project) federal independent liberal democratic state of Rashki [Russia], which many of its supporters for “free Siberia” supposedly to quietly develop independently and no longer feed Muscovy [Moscow], Chechnya and all the other freeloaders.

        [Section] Separation from Faggots [derogatory for Russians?]

        On Rasey [Russia], many are surprised. Why would it be some fascist commies in the Scoop [USSR]

        I laughed so fucking hard. As if I went to an article in LiveJournal or to some forum where libs are lurking.

        Classic Russian liberals - write this shit, then act surprised why population would rather support current oligarchy than your pathetic ass.

      • SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Damn. The only thing I knew about Siberia was that Huskies came from there. This is enlightening information.

  • sinovictorchan@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Liberals interestingly label the four most successful countries from the non-Western European diaspora as the four enemies. Is it a coincidence that countries that become superpower without Western European diaspora are somehow the most evil countries in the world? Or is it Western European jeolousy to destroy any success by the people of color like the historic destruction of the Black Wall Street and conquest of free slaves in the USA?

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      four most successful countries from the non-Western European diaspora as the four enemies

      China, Iran and who else? DPRK?

      • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The map lists Syria and Russia. I wouldn’t call Syria one of “the four most successful countries from the non-Western European diaspora,” mostly because of the sanctions, but the point deserves to be made that they’re all “non-white.”

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s solely their lack of European-ness that causes their evil. It’s unfortunate, but sadly, they just require a bit of civilising from the garden. We must go in there and teach them not to be evil by bombing their schools and hospitals and leaving huge chunks of the land uninhabitable for decades afterwards. It’s the only way. We also need to take all their resources so they can’t use them for evil just in case our civilising attempts fail.

      • sinovictorchan@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Indian Residential fake schools that enslave, torture, and then kill Indigenous children in unethical experimentations in North America and Australia from 1850s to 2000s under the pretense of cultural assimilation also examplified this as well, so I can understand how meaningless violence, looting, property right violation, and authoritarianism by European diaspora with their Bretton Woods Institutions and Pax Americana somehow worked.

  • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because when the British did this with India it went so well. We should invite them back to Asia to finish their colonialism, seems only fair.