Please ignore the wild growth of grocery costs. Also I hate how “inflation is only 2% now” but the fucking eggs still cost 2x what they did 3 years ago.

  • RedCat@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, these ghouls are evil. How great that inflation is only at 2% but that doesn’t make the already inflated prices any better.

  • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    The only time I have ever got a “raise” in my life was on changing jobs to a hgher position. To be fair, it was a substantial increase, but only because I was grossly underpaid before.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      they probably excluded all real jobs and just counted CEOs or something. like that krugman(?) chart where he proves that the price of things is fine, while carefully excluding anything actually needed to live, like food and housing.

      • supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Economists are for the most part huge frauds. They are the court jesters of the ruling class, except their jokes aren’t funny.

        I have met some k-pop style economist fanboys, and one of them said the way to control Pinochet and Friedman Chicago boys would have been through sensible regulations. What do you even say to that?

  • RedClouds@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    Okay, obviously the new story is crazy and everybody is talking about that, but can we please talk about how stupid this graph is?

    The x-axis is labeled every five years except for starting with 1999 for some reason. It makes sense to stop at 2023 because that’s probably the extent of the data.

    But then the years aren’t properly aligned with the tick marks that represent the year?!? And there’s two major tick marks per year on the x-axis?!

    And I just can’t tell on my phone screen. But I think the data stops before the last tick mark? which implies too many tick marks… It just doesn’t make any sense.

  • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Or could it be that the necessity for growth means that “costs” like keeping your workers alive become increasingly “burdensome.” Anyone notice how the economy has massively grown in every measurement in the last centuries yet it hasn’t become more stable or confident in its own sustainability?

    • 陆船。@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think growth is tapped out. Most companies have turned purely to rent seeking behavior and chasing down pennies. Eg the Netflix account sharing changes, Adobe licensing, YouTube moving to freemium model, Twitch ad spam, airline “upgrades”. This isn’t behavior you engage in unless your monopoly is tapped out.

      • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yup, TRPF at its finest. Everyone wants to be a pure parasite because actually doing stuff doesn’t make big bucks anymore.

    • 陆船。@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t even know who this article is for. My boss who subscribes and reads this crap didn’t give me a raise, I didn’t receive one, and all the big bourgeois did layoffs. Who tf is getting paid more yoy that they need to gaslight and mald over?

  • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hell even canned food like generic Kroger beans cost damn near 1.5 times what they initially were at two years ago (1.50 or even 1.75 for what was initially a 0.99 cent can).

  • Teapot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    This isn’t a measure of raises, it’s a measure of average wage. If you want a pay increase, you need to move jobs

    • SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you want a pay increase, you need to move jobs

      Poors only have lateral class mobility. You want minimum wage or a buck or two above minimum wage (that is functionally still minimum wage post-tax)? Sure. An actual, tangible pay increase? Good luck.

    • 陆船。@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Powell explicitly stated last year unemployment was too low. Interest rate raises and layoffs have rebuilt the reserve army of labor specifically to suppress your ability to move jobs and seek higher wages, even in the labor aristocrat jobs.