• intelshill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It should be a no-brainer to not fund and ship weapons to a state committing a genocide, and yet here we are.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        So, a genocide doesn’t count unless it’s complete, and if the Palestinians in Gaza knew what was good for them they’d self-ethnic-cleanse?

        they have genocidal leadership who are clearly intent on attacking their neighbors until they’re all dead.

        What you’re implying is that Hamas is bringing down genocide on their own people via the IDF. Since Hamas is in control of, and responsible for the IDF, why don’t they use it to attack Israel? Are they stupid?

      • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        All natives resist colonialism, the only genocidal maniacs are the Zionist invaders. You are suggesting removing Palestinians to Jordan instead of removing the illegal settlements in the West Bank.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How many of the attacked cargo ships were transporting weapons? And what, cargo ships transporting Russian oil are just fair game for NATO to blow up now because they’re funding genocide?

      • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes, but the Russians have nukes so actually no. If you have nukes you basically get to do what you want and the other great powers don’t get to attack you. If you don’t have nukes you don’t get that privilege