• Dickarus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 months ago

    I like how you can get a ticket for using your phone while driving, so automakers decided to replace your tactile radio, where you don’t need to look at it to operate, with what is basically a giant touchscreen phone in your car where you need to look at it to see what you’re doing instead of feeling what you’re doing.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep it should just be illegal plain and simple. Maybe some screens that are mainly intended for passive display that you can still use with touch, but all main functions one would need to use while operating the vehicle should be buttons and dials.

        • TeckFire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Many states have laws prohibiting the use of anything that isn’t hands free, including integrated media controls. Won’t stop anyone, but just because it’s illegal doesn’t mean people won’t do it. Same as speeding, or eating/drinking while driving in many states.

  • Gerula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is actually very good news for car manufacturers.

    Touch crap was cheaper but sold a new tech so => price increase

    Buttons are old tech so no new investments or tech development but they are more complicated => price increase

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      Thank you! I’ve been making this argument a LOT with recent discussions on kids not understanding keyboards and controllers because their lives are full of touchscreens.

      Touch isn’t “the future”. It just absolutely flooded the market.

      • Gerula@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        They 100% do! But the marketing departments always likes to have “solid” arguments at hand.

        How else can they organise fairs and conferences where they can lament about how poor the automakers are and how pressure from are pulling prices down so automakers cannot compete… how they have to fire people and move production in poorer countries where people can be treated more like slaves… how profits are so low that they have to use the same jets with the same bitches twice!

  • trackindakraken@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m hoping by the time I need a new car, this insanity will have passed, allowing me to skip it. It’s like everyone skipped Windows Vista.

    • lando55@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      By that time they will start selling monthly subscriptions to use the buttons or they will revert to a regular touchscreen

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Carmakers did this to copy Tesla, not realising that Tesla did it to save themselves a few bucks and to hell with the person who suffer a degraded or unsafe driving experience as a result. Witness how Tesla even removed indicator stalks, making it all but impossible for people to safely and legally navigate a roundabout. Who cares if someone crashes, because it’s all about the bottom line.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 months ago

      not realising that Tesla did it to save themselves a few bucks

      I guarantee you they realized that and likely did it for the same reason.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d go as far as mounting a full size qwerty keyboard on the steering wheel. Although we’d somehow have to deal with the shrapnel grenade situation as soon as the airbag hits it.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t mind a touchscreen. Apple CarPlay/Android Auto are really nice.

      I just also want physical controls for everything the car needs to do to be a car, like climate control or wipers or shifting. And also physical controls for play/pause, skip, volume, and tuning.

      Touchscreens can do a lot to enhance the car experience, but they cannot replace physical buttons.

  • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m very glad, the lack of buttons are a safety hazard… Looking at these stupid TESLA cars especially… You can’t even adjust the AC without messing with the touchscreen, which means your eyes are not on the road…

    Still not going to own a car, but at least it will be slightly safer by bringing back physical buttons, so hurray for small victories.

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I own two cars. The newest is a 2013 because it’s before touchscreens became standard equipment. I’m gonna limp those bitches along until either I die or that trend reverses.

      • Actually, I am wondering if these dumb things can be replaced with aftermarket stuff. I kinda have my doubts. I miss when you could just pull the stereo out yourself and slide a new one into the bay like a disc drive on a PC.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        limp those bitches along

        I hope you don’t have to limp them along. My newest vehicle is from 2007, and my oldest from '84. They aren’t limping, they run and drive quite well.

        • elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well one runs like a top. The other I need to replace the suspension on but the engine is sound.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      For a while now I’ve been thinking about idea where flexible display can be combined with some sort of mechanism where a button on the display can be shown and underneath display in same place it would raise the display slightly. Just enough to be tactile and easy to find without looking. We might see these at some point as stars seem to be aligning that way.

    • LittleHermiT@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I said the same to a Tesla owner who informed me buttons on the steering wheel provide all these functionalities. But upvoters don’t own a Tesla.

      • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not all functionalities. You can’t even adjust the direction/power of the AC or open the glovebox without multiple presses on the touchscreen.

        • LittleHermiT@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          There’s no physical button to open the glovebox? Better not keep anything critical in there in case of a software failure.

          • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Either software or hardware failure of the big infotainment system can suck really badly, and TESLA is also an anti-repair company too…

    • Locrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      You have buttons on the wheel and voice commands. But it must be nice to stay in your little ignorant bubble so I will leave you be now.

  • NoThatNow@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Finally people are starting to see that touch screens or any other touch surfaces don’t belong into cars.

  • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    A great reminder that your voice does matter. Apply it other things as well, and things can actually improve…

  • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    You want buttons back because they’re easier to use

    I want them back because I think car interiors look bland without them

    We are not the same…alright I also want them back for the first reason aswell.

  • popcap200@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    I test drove one, and the touch buttons were ass, but nobody mentions the lag. There’s ZERO feedback, do you press the button again and watch the screen show you turn the thing on and then back off.

    I would NEVER buy a car with touch controls based on this experience. It was horrible.

    • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I swore I would never buy a car with a touchscreen, but I ended up with a Toyota with no noticable touch lag and physical controls for everything important. The steering wheel buttons also replicate all phone- and radio-related functions that are on the touchscreen.

      The wife’s Honda (a few years older) has too many physical controls. For example, I’m fairly certain you could turn on heat for the driver and rear passenger-side, and air conditioning for the passenger and rear driver-side, if you really wanted to.

      • popcap200@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh yeah, honestly, I don’t mind the controls on a touchscreen as you get immediate feedback on most, if not all cars, but for some reason on that GTI, the touch buttons on the dashboard and wheel didn’t work for me at all.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I wonder if that’s a lingering effect from the auto chip shortage from 2020 (limited choice lead to using processors less powerful than they’d like), or just the general shitty quality common when companies try to add features outside of what they are familiar with? Maybe combined with hiring shitty developers that want to run a full browser stack when they need to be doing embedded real-time programming instead?

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    and to add insult to injury, I couldn’t turn the heater on countless times because the climate portion of the OS was unresponsive. Other times, it would simply say that the function couldn’t be performed at the time. Why? No idea.

    This is the main problem, not something about the UI being wonky. That my AC can freeze not because of the radiator but because of a shitty UI system? That’s insane.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s not true though. This happened in their EVs regardless of price range. Even the Porsche Taycan which requires using a screen to adjust HVAC vents. Other than some steering wheel buttons the Taycan is all screens.

      The Audi E-Tron GT (same chassis as the Taycan) oddly enough has more buttons. But that’s because VAG makes sure Porsche and Audi interiors are slightly different for different market segments.

      It’s more about VAG thinking (like many automakers) copying the Tesla trend was what people wanted. The mistake made was not considering Tesla early adopters often being techy people who might not match broader market opinion.