• Windows2000Srv@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Something that people should keep in mind is that the fees were lower for those “out-of-province” students in Québec than in their own province.

    This fee raise basically brings it on par with what they would pay in their on province. One of the reasoning behind this law is that Québec shouldn’t be subsidizing other provinces way too expensive university system.

    If you are living in Québec, university fees are quite cheap, and this doesn’t change.

    The French vs English aspect is widely talked about, but not a whole lot is mentioned about the actual price hike.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      The total fees for out of province students will still be lower than for out of province students in other provinces.

      The fees for international students will still be lower than the fees for international students in other provinces.

      In the only province where French is the only official language, French universities received less financing than English universities no matter the source, including from the provincial government. Donating to one’s Alma Mater isn’t part of the French Canadian culture for a ton of historical reasons, that leads to an university like McGill getting 200m$ from a single ex student and having over a billion sleeping in its coffers while the Université du Québec en Outaouais barely manages to offer basic services to its students.

      Is it such a bad thing that the government asks that foreign students integrate themselves by learning the local language? That’s an incentive for them to stay and it prevents the issue of having some of them stay without being able to speak the language, pretty much forcing them to live in one of three urban areas and their suburbs (Montreal, Gatineau, Sherbrooke).

        • force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They are foreign though, literally. They are from a different province, plus a very different culture. There isn’t much that separates someone from Alberta from someone from Montana or Massachussetts in that case, other than a passport.

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            So?

            My neighbour is of a different culture than me, yet I don’t think of them as a foreigner.

            I could cross the state border and find someone of a different culture in a different state with different laws, they’re still not a foreigner.

        • dlpkl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s just a taste of how badly Quebec’s nationalists try to create a rift. But they’ll be the first to turn around and tell you that Anglos are the problem.

          Cambridge dictionary definition of foreign: belonging or connected to a country that is not your own.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          See there’s this thing we call “a definition” and that word is appropriate to the situation and if you think “foreigner” is pejorative then you’re the one who’s got an issue…

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Yeah totally, it’s not at all a well-known derogatory term used to other people’s.

            Honestly if this is how French Canadians act, I totally get the reputation. Sounds like a bunch of downright exclusionary shit cunts.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              “Oh no, French Canadians use words in their second language based on their definition, what a bunch of exclusionary shit cunts!”

              You should really go sit down and reflect on the way you just acted.

      • C126@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        French is a dead language, just admit it and move on with your lives already Quebec.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          More and more people speak it on a global scale, you shouldn’t celebrate the disappearance of non English cultures.

    • dlpkl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s all a smoke show. The real reason is their objective of nationalism.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Anglo Canadians see Quebec’s interculturalism as nationalism in the third Reich sense…

        • dlpkl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Quebec’s nationalism involves alienating non-French speaking Canadians including its own residents (eg Montrealers), creating a narrative that Quebec’s culture is at risk of being wiped out, reinforcing a victim complex, blaming its own minorities while complaining about being a minority, and by enacting discriminory laws that only aim to exclude those who don’t fit their image of what a Quebecer should be.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s exactly what it is though, they would never dare say the same thing about a first Nation community adopting similar rules.

            • dlpkl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Because in our treaties and agreements they are quite literally sovereign nations that have the right to self determination. Unlike the Quebecois, they actually were here first, and they really are a minority at risk of extinction. It’s so strange how French Canadians can’t understand nuance.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              No you see the only groups that get to use the government to hurt other groups is the groups I personally like.

              Humans are “meant” to be multilingual. That is norm for us. I still remember the small shock I felt when we were visiting my wife’s homeland for the first time and it turns out there is a language with under 6 million people, spoken only in one small region, that she knew plus the most common language of her country.

              So yeah this is a group being punished for speaking their own language on land that they originally owned, plus anyone who wants to study there and doesn’t speak French. This is freedom? This is a just society? This is education? Schools are supposed to teach not force monolithic thought and punish people for being born “wrong”.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                First Nations have no French requirements and are allowed to get service in English in Quebec if they want to, that’s a protected right.

                Also very very funny that you would go from saying “Humans are meant to be multilingual” to “I can’t believe they have to learn a second language!”

                It’s incredible how easy it is to point out the the Anglo hypocrisy.

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Wow ok you clearly need to read things slowly. Humans are meant to speak multiple languages, that doesn’t mean governments have a right to say fuck you if you don’t know a particular one.

                  Got it? Be educated and don’t punish people for not having one random piece of crap in their head. I hope you understand, maybe if you don’t you can have someone translate it for you in the obscure language called French.

                  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Perfect, no language obligations for schools anymore, let’s let French Canadian culture get assimilated by English culture.

                    Is that what you want? You’re mad that first Nation culture has it rough and your reaction is “This other cultural minority should disappear too”?

        • dlpkl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’ve got an issue with people calling out racists and nationalists?

            • dlpkl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              The most egregious example would be Bill 21. Absolutely horrendous legislation that does nothing but marginalize those who are already marginalized. Despite what the Quebecois would like you to believe, it’s a piece of proxy legislation that aims to exclude religious and ethnic minorities from Quebec society, plain as day.

              • Quokka@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Just a quick look, that’s just the same as France’s law on religious iconography except only for government employees?

                Trying to limit the danger of religion sounds like a good thing to me.

                • dlpkl@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Firstly, this isn’t France. We have a charter of rights and freedoms that Quebec used a BS notwithstanding clause to get around so that they could pass the bill. Secondly, there’s practical and effective ways to curb the danger of religion without taking a) taking away people’s livelihoods b) making them choose between their faith and their job and c) forcing them to move out of the province to find a workplace that doesn’t go against Canadian ideals.

              • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Oh the double standards. The religious minorities should be protected at all costs, but the québécois don’t deserve that same protection. It’s always the ““inclusivity/minority activists”” that are the most against Québec when Québec itself fits inside this very definition. For the common good, please just fuck off.

                • dlpkl@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s really funny how triggered you are. Believe it or not but French speakers aren’t a minority in Quebec. Wild, I know!