That doesn’t really work as a comparison, because it devolves into the question “does anyone deserve to live?”
The fact is, someone fooled by someone else doesn’t deserve the consequences. The person who deceived them is the only one that “deserves” negative consequences.
No they don’t. That is the epitome of victim blaming.
No, I think it’s a take on the word ‘deserving’ since it’s pretty open to interpretation.
Does someone in constant pain deserve to live?
The fall of the country is probably a good thing. We need more rational people in charge.
That doesn’t really work as a comparison, because it devolves into the question “does anyone deserve to live?”
The fact is, someone fooled by someone else doesn’t deserve the consequences. The person who deceived them is the only one that “deserves” negative consequences.
Not letting the person in question be the decider for themselves is pretty wrong.
Wtf are you talking about?
Yes… because violent civil wars always lead to intelligent and rational leaders.
Get out of here with that bullshit.
Have you seen how elections are going?
And how does a violent civil war in the country with the largest military and most nukes help that? I am genuinely curious to hear your answer
You came in here with that violent civil war shit. Argue against my stance, not one you made up.
So… how does that happen peacefully without mass suffering?
Hypothetically it already happened once and nobody really cared. Remember that government shutdown?
And the same people are still in charge, so…
Try building something before you decide to burn down our society.
I have several times. I end up having everything I’ve worked for taken away over and over.