I was checking out the new season of Fargo, which made me want to rewatch the 1996 movie and I got to thinking, the Coen Brothers have a fantastic filmography. They have way more hits than misses and they make some of the most interesting movies out there. No Country for Old Men is probably one of my favorites of all time. So who’s filmography do you celebrate the most?

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only dark spot on Terry Gilliam’s record is Brothers Grimm. The rest isn’t for everyone but it’s all quality.

    He offers: Brazil Time Bandits 12 Monkeys Barron Munchausen Fisher King Fear and Loathing And Monty Python stuff.

  • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wes Anderson and Christopher Nolan. Their movies always are subject to debate, but every single one was stuck in my mind after seeing them.

    • canthidium@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      With you on both. Although, I gotta be in the mood for Wes Anderson sometimes. I love his movies, but if I’m not in the mood, I find I don’t enjoy them as much, even on rewatch.

      Nolan is always amazing to me. Audio issues aside, I enjoyed Tenet more than most, as well.

      • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seriously, I loved Tenet! I had to watch it multiple times to finally understand how they moved through time relatively to the opposite side, what happened how, and it was fun and really well thought out. I loved this take on time travel!

        Yes, you can understand the movie after watching it once. But there are so many little details that you won’t get if you don’t watch it multiple times, I had fun puzzling it together!

        It’s in my top three of the Nolan movies! And the music was great, I did not mind that it was too loud!

        • canthidium@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’m a cinematography and logistics nerd. I am fascinated by just how they do things in film a lot and Nolan is great for that.

          And the music was great, I did not mind that it was too loud!

          I think the big issue was the dialogue was too low a lot of the time.

          • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Regarding the dialogue: on my second watch (with subtitles) in the (few) scenes I wasn’t able to hear the dialogue clearly I realized it wasn’t relevant/important to the story. I believe these scenes were only about atmosphere, that was the moment I did not mind anymore and just enjoyed the bombastic sound scape.

            • drawerair@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I searched by typing Tenet and found your comment.

              The 1st time I viewed Tenet, I didn’t think hard. I didn’t get it. I disliked Tenet.

              Many hours ago I thought I’d rewatch with more focus. I’d try to get everything. Based on Nolan’s other flicks, he probably didn’t write a dumb plot just for the $. I understood and appreciated Tenet. It’s 👍 that Nolan didn’t spoonfeed us by directing Tenet so it was easily understandable. I wouldn’t get it if I didn’t give it much focus. It’s 👍 that Nolan directed flicks with bold concepts. Tenet was too complex for some, but I suggest that they rewatch with more focus. They can search for explanations on the Net too. No shame in that.

              I look forward to Nolan’s next.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Denis Villeneuve hands down. The guy has never made a bad mainstream film yet. Some would argue Enemy is his worst, and even then it’s not really a bad film.

  • ours@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since someone already mentioned Villeneuve, I’ll say Wes Anderson.

    He has a very distinct style but that’s a lot of great, beautiful movies.

  • rezz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    David Fincher is pretty rock solid. The Social Network is his best movie; all of his murder thrillers are equally good. Alien3 is his worst and hardly counts because it was a clean up job, and still isn’t a bad movie.

    • canthidium@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fincher is one of my favs of all time. I just love how purposeful he is. Every camera angle and dolly move is for a specific reason. Nothing is a mistake in his films.

  • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll have to go with Edgar Wright for the Corneto trilogy and Scott Pilgrim. Those movies are so dense and well thought out.

  • deus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hard agree on the Coen brothers, their filmography is absolutely stellar. Other than them I think Hayao Miyazaki deserves a mention here. Dude basically never missed in his entire carreer as a director.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I own a BUNCH of movies, but there are only a few creators where I feel obligated to a) own ALL their movies and b) group them together as a block.

    Coen Brothers
    Kevin Smith
    Quentin Tarantino
    Wes Anderson
    The Marx Brothers
    Baz Luhrmann

  • wawowiwe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Stanley Kubrick

    Federico Fellini

    Yasujiro Ozu

    Alain Resnais

    Martin Scorcese

    Marcel Carmé

    Fritz Lang

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      OP is specifically asking about dirs but yeah some DOPs might have filmographies to rival them.

      Robert Richardson is another contender. Casino, Kill Bill, Platoon…

      • canthidium@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        OP is specifically asking about dirs but yeah some DOPs might have filmographies to rival them.

        Lol, I didn’t want to say it. But for sure, especially the ones like Deakins that form basically a partnership with certain directors and do almost all their movies.

  • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    George A Romero is definitely worth checking out. He’s earned the moniker “Father of the Zombie Film,” and for good reason.

    If you’re into classic movies, I’d suggest starting with Night of the Living Dead (1968). That one really turned heads when it came out. If classic movies aren’t really your thing, Land of the Dead (2005) is a very fun romp.

    Day of the Dead (1985) is probably my all-time favourite movie. I appreciate that his movies are not only fun zombie movies, but they also have a message behind them. Day of the Dead is full of existential dread, and touches at the meaning or absurdity of life, and how that means different things to different people.

    In each of his zombie movies, although the undead do pose a mortal and existential threat, Romero holds up a mirror to humanity and says that its our innate inability to cooperate which dooms us. It’s a powerful message, and one that seems to have held up for the past sixty years if you follow the news.