Communism will give children better working conditions, as well as a great reduction in work hours. Child acting and other stuff like that should strictly be a hobby. I think we agree on this since you said it should not be accepted presently. By hobby I’m just talking about the hours they put in not money. They should get paid obviously.

That’s true. However, capitalism pollutes everything, including jobs in the entertainment industry. Have you ever thought it odd that society allows kids to play in movies or other forms of entertainment? Putting children to work in this way constitutes child labor. In my opinion, this Hollywood capitalist fantasy is now exploiting children for their own benefit. Those are the signs of capitalist decadence.

I think technology is wonderful, and it should be used in a way that benefits humanity. My comment that western capitalist values ruin the way we use those things might not be considered a “Marxist” viewpoint by some. I don’t know, but I feel like so many kids these days want to be famous influencers. I see this as an extension of Hollywood celebrity nonsense. This online culture from social media produces crap like fidget spinners. There are always new fads and products emerging. Almost none of them have any real benefit. Capitalism has destroyed literally everything, including culture.

The text below was written by the revolutionary Che Guevara.

In this period of the building of socialism we can see the new man and woman being born. The image is not yet completely finished — it never will be, since the process goes forward hand in hand with the development of new economic forms.

Aside from those whose lack of education makes them take the solitary road toward satisfying their own personal ambitions, there are those — even within this new panorama of a unified march forward — who have a tendency to walk separately from the masses accompanying them. What is important, however, is that each day individuals are acquiring ever more consciousness of the need for their incorporation into society and, at the same time, of their importance as the motor of that society.

They no longer travel completely alone over lost roads toward distant aspirations. They follow their vanguard, consisting of the party, the advanced workers, the advanced individuals who walk in unity with the masses and in close communion with them. The vanguard has its eyes fixed on the future and its reward, but this is not a vision of reward for the individual. The prize is the new society in which individuals will have different characteristics: the society of communist human beings.

awesome post btw. The future of humanity rests on China’s shoulders…

For the liberals who downvoted, here are some high IQ jokes.

Why is the USA more authoritarian than China? Because in the USA, you have to pay for freedom and everybody is poor!

Why doesn’t Tibet need to be freed twice? Because China already did it once and they’re not going to do it again!

““its emergence as the world’s biggest auto exporter and leader in electric vehicles have all surprised large segments of the international community.””"–from the article.

It’s the ‘international community’ again… 🤡

Like genders, I view the white race to be largely a social construct. I do not view all white people as enemies. I don’t know why the downvotes happened, probably liberals.

It’s often just white people being racist. They already had a negative opinion of them, so propaganda works well.

I’m basically saying “human nature” is really good and its 99% changed due to external reasons. That was this whole conversation :P

I would say that in “full communism” that would not really exist. similar to my idea of primitive communism

what does that have to do with removing the rights of a certain type of people. What you said sounds like just one person oppressing one person

honestly i dont know why you even said that yourself but whatever

why would someone do that. whats the motivation?

It’s you who did this to me but that “control” came from outside my head is not powerful enough for me to oppress others. my motivation to oppress others would come from food/money

OK but what is this motivation that changes that?

We are confusing the word nature because of “human nature” and nature such as the world outside the head.

No? i don’t think with words in my head if I should oppress a certain type of people? I just naturally dont do it

What do you mean by choosing. Thats sounds like a choice? something that can be debated in the head with words?

oppression people is an action(a thought such as making the other village the enemy put into action) while not oppressing people is nothing(natural).

The concept of money was put into the food. But before that people respected each other “naturally”. until those scumbags farmers put the concept of money in the “world” —outside the head

Ok but there must have been a time where people lived in peace. Then the farmers made the concept of money in the world. The word natural is extremely misleading.