Exactly! Nowadays hardly anyone thinks about the shareholders!! Think about the shareholders!!!
A software engineer that loves Disroot and the team behind it.
Exactly! Nowadays hardly anyone thinks about the shareholders!! Think about the shareholders!!!
If you enjoyed it, I’ve collected a couple of others:
Reminds me this great story from a different era:
The Left controls your mother too.
Nah, he’s not that great… We already see him giving a silent nod to investors while ignoring how bad housing situation is in the country. Also, coalition with the left is mostly on paper - he claimed he’d clean up the mess with Catholic church reducing its funding. Now the church is getting comparable money from the new government. I don’t trust them.
Is that number with us in this room right now?
Why marry a turd in the first place? 🤷
Your body? You mean body of knowledge?
But where’s Saddam? 🤔
It would be as good as letting MS Song Smith generate soundtrack for “Whiplash” 🤭
Hasn’t anybody told him what eating pussy means?
I definitely agree that too many comments is often a bad sign, esp. when large part of them is obviously generated.
As mentioned in my other comment, names will rarely explain the reasons why a given solution was chosen. These reasons are important from maintenance perspective and should be recorded next to the relevant code.
You’re definitely not the only one.
In my opinion the important information we should record in comments is WHY, because the code can only explain HOW, maybe WHEN, but never WHY. If we don’t know WHY, any refactoring done in the future could break the logic by ignoring assumptions made by the authors.
Thanks for making me aware 🙇
Per aspera ad Aster
You could step up for animals while still being a nice person - it was your decision not to.
I keep telling myself that in the ideal world, phones would be programmed in Forth.
Thanks for mentioning that! 🖤