I still wish bluesky was activpub compatable tho.
I still wish bluesky was activpub compatable tho.
Well every dof is extra cost
15-20 degrees is a lot tho
1+1=3=e=π=√g=√10=c*10^-8
Shit am i agreeing with a hexbear. Fuck i really do need to reconsider my opinion.
The dems: get mad at trump for pardoning people they dony like
Biden: pardons his own son.
The dems: when we do it its ok.
Clearly as bad as eachother wake up they want u to get distracted by this while they carefully tie the noise around ur neck.
Just cos its lazy doesnt mean it aint true
I get downvoted for saying both parties are as bad as eachother. Whats the justification for this lol?
Hows tgat gender affirming? Its not like only men have hair on their head.
EDIT: Why are u booing me im right
Ist that ths kind of place for a non profit organisation. They monetise and pay devs and marketers and as long as u keep it foss thwn that helps the community as a whole.
We need a nonprofit that provides reccommendations to all the Activpub services and helps to steer them in the right direction.
Yeah if they used Activpub then id be onboard 100%. Its just that there architecture is fundamentally incompatible with Activpub. Federation was supposed to destroy the fragmentation not join it.
100% agree
I did block it.
The only reason to then continue to push for its continued ban would be because u think u know better than everyone else and that they dont deserve the liberty to make that decision for themselves. Am i wrong?
However having a bot that pretends to know everything doesn’t help anyone.
I liked it it helped me, therefore disproven
Make the decision yourself to find out whether or not the article leans one way or the other, don’t let someone else do it for you.
Give everyone the liberty to make that decision for themselves. Stop advocating for the restriction upon my liberty because u think thats whats best.
No. Im a self serving bastard who wants to see Activpub as the dominant form of content sharing and discussion. Because i think Activpub is an objectivly better standard that gives more power and liberty to the individual.
This is not how proof by contradiction works. And I’m not versed enough in the subject of proofs to explain how.
Im trying to prove its impossible. I assumed that u can reconcile free/hate speach. We are arguing about what is hate speach thus proving we cant reconcile the concepts therefore the assumption cannot be true therefore it must be impossible.
“A proof by contradiction is a method of proving a statement by assuming the opposite statement is true, and then showing that this assumption leads to a logical contradiction.” - dr gpt
It’s not the subjective experience of the offended what makes it hate speech, but the perceived intention of the offender.
hate speech noun [ U ]
public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation (= the fact of being gay, etc.):
So its about the expression of hate by the speach itself not the intention or perception of either party.
This raises the question what is hate?
hate
verb [ I or T ]
to dislike someone or something very much:
Misgendering someone is not an “expression of dislike towards someone or something very much” as it is passing no judgement (well unless ur a sexist who sees sex/gender as a value judgement). Its not encouraging violence and its not doing any of this based on race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.
You haven’t answered any of my questions friend.
None of ur questions are relevent to disproving my clear and concise logical argument. You have failed to address my argument the first time and i simply assumed i didnt explain it clearly enough hence why i ignored the questions that didnt relate to the argument itself and chose to explain my argument more clearly in what i though where simpler terms.
That is a major issue the fediverse needs to fix.
We need a single federated account that works across all platforms that iant tied to a single server even if said server goes down that preferably allows for your private key to be held by u. Ideally get this to work with the new passkey standard supported by google, apple, microsoft etc.
Then. We need to make a website that is like 3 simple steps.
Step 0: Option a) sign up with email Option b) sign up with username
Step 1: Select or search for 3 categories ur interested in
Step 2: Show me nsfw yes/no default no Show me extreme opinions yes/no default no (need to rework what word to use instead of “extreme”) Show me bot accounts yes/no default yes
Step 2.5: automaticly send said user off to an instance that is the following:
Step 3: user signs up to the instance they have been directed to
Step 4: reccommend people/communities etc fir them to follow/subscribe to. Reccommend blockliats for specific subjects, racist, tankie, asshole, nazi, etc.
Done!
Their already exists a standard for accounts just that its not yet been implemented into most services yet. Mastodon already has blocklists (although poorly managed and implemented). It wouldnt be too hard to make this website i could probably do it myself ngl.
Should probably also drop this vid into the proccess somewhere as a quick explainer.
We used to be <1% we are now up to about 4%. We are on the slow lead in to the exponential curve.
Yeah that generally seems to be an issue with a lot of foss projects.
If u dont like it u can block it. Why should ur laziness and failure to hit the block button supersede my liberty to read what the bot wrote?
Of course it came from a chinese lab. Simpky apply Arkham’s Razor.
From a city where they happened to be studying the gain of function of corona viruses. A bunch of scientists who worked at said lab who where raising concerns about covid disappeared. Us aussies pushed for an independent assessment by the WHO and as a result china fucked with our ore trading, out wine trading, and held live lobsters on a tarmac in chinese heat for 6hours. All news sources that are pro china didnt even entertain the idea that it could be china. Said lab where the virus alleged leaked was investigated prior and found to have extreme negligence. For a virus to successfully make the zooinotic jump it needs to symultaniously gain the ability to infect and to spread (very unlikely) we are currently witnessing h5n1 attempting this jump and it had had many many failed attempted so far this was not witnessed for covid.
I aint saying it was definatly a leak just that the odds that it iant are more extreme than if it was. And if it was its more likly to be from negligence than malice.
“Never attribute to malice that which is adequatSimplyplained by ignorance”
— Robert J. Hanlon (Hanlon’s Razor)