🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

  • 13 Posts
  • 1.34K Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 20th, 2024

help-circle
  • Of course it came from a chinese lab. Simpky apply Arkham’s Razor.

    From a city where they happened to be studying the gain of function of corona viruses. A bunch of scientists who worked at said lab who where raising concerns about covid disappeared. Us aussies pushed for an independent assessment by the WHO and as a result china fucked with our ore trading, out wine trading, and held live lobsters on a tarmac in chinese heat for 6hours. All news sources that are pro china didnt even entertain the idea that it could be china. Said lab where the virus alleged leaked was investigated prior and found to have extreme negligence. For a virus to successfully make the zooinotic jump it needs to symultaniously gain the ability to infect and to spread (very unlikely) we are currently witnessing h5n1 attempting this jump and it had had many many failed attempted so far this was not witnessed for covid.

    I aint saying it was definatly a leak just that the odds that it iant are more extreme than if it was. And if it was its more likly to be from negligence than malice.

    “Never attribute to malice that which is adequatSimplyplained by ignorance”

    — Robert J. Hanlon (Hanlon’s Razor)
















  • This is not how proof by contradiction works. And I’m not versed enough in the subject of proofs to explain how.

    Im trying to prove its impossible. I assumed that u can reconcile free/hate speach. We are arguing about what is hate speach thus proving we cant reconcile the concepts therefore the assumption cannot be true therefore it must be impossible.

    “A proof by contradiction is a method of proving a statement by assuming the opposite statement is true, and then showing that this assumption leads to a logical contradiction.” - dr gpt

    It’s not the subjective experience of the offended what makes it hate speech, but the perceived intention of the offender.

    hate speech noun [ U ]

    public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation (= the fact of being gay, etc.):

    • Cambridge dictionary

    So its about the expression of hate by the speach itself not the intention or perception of either party.

    This raises the question what is hate?

    hate

    verb [ I or T ]

    to dislike someone or something very much:

    • Cambridge dictionary

    Misgendering someone is not an “expression of dislike towards someone or something very much” as it is passing no judgement (well unless ur a sexist who sees sex/gender as a value judgement). Its not encouraging violence and its not doing any of this based on race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.

    You haven’t answered any of my questions friend.

    None of ur questions are relevent to disproving my clear and concise logical argument. You have failed to address my argument the first time and i simply assumed i didnt explain it clearly enough hence why i ignored the questions that didnt relate to the argument itself and chose to explain my argument more clearly in what i though where simpler terms.


  • That is a major issue the fediverse needs to fix.

    We need a single federated account that works across all platforms that iant tied to a single server even if said server goes down that preferably allows for your private key to be held by u. Ideally get this to work with the new passkey standard supported by google, apple, microsoft etc.

    Then. We need to make a website that is like 3 simple steps.

    Step 0: Option a) sign up with email Option b) sign up with username

    Step 1: Select or search for 3 categories ur interested in

    Step 2: Show me nsfw yes/no default no Show me extreme opinions yes/no default no (need to rework what word to use instead of “extreme”) Show me bot accounts yes/no default yes

    Step 2.5: automaticly send said user off to an instance that is the following:

    1. Respects their email/username sign up choice
    2. Related to their interests
    3. Respects their nsfw choice
    4. Is defederated from extreme instances for dont show me extreme opinions hexbear lemmy.ml etc 4.Respects the load any individual instance can handle that the instance admin can configure.

    Step 3: user signs up to the instance they have been directed to

    Step 4: reccommend people/communities etc fir them to follow/subscribe to. Reccommend blockliats for specific subjects, racist, tankie, asshole, nazi, etc.

    Done!

    Their already exists a standard for accounts just that its not yet been implemented into most services yet. Mastodon already has blocklists (although poorly managed and implemented). It wouldnt be too hard to make this website i could probably do it myself ngl.

    Should probably also drop this vid into the proccess somewhere as a quick explainer.