![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://ttrpg.network/pictrs/image/3f8ac09e-5b9a-4afd-b819-e92970b5174f.jpeg)
To me this just looks like theorycrafting paired with a meme. I don’t see anything wrong with it, and it’s not like they’re trying to do something that is clearly better in another system
To me this just looks like theorycrafting paired with a meme. I don’t see anything wrong with it, and it’s not like they’re trying to do something that is clearly better in another system
There is a fucking time and place for this kind of comment.
huh
your entire profile is nitpicking people’s grammar
Plot twist: The orc is saying the first one.
i dont care ❤️
This was Second Edition from the 80’s.
Not all RPG rulebooks have one of their first play examples be a guy dying from falling off his camel
alright if you want a curse placed on your entire bloodline so badly
she found a tome of eldritch lore
Opens fine in Connect
I can do you a few of the most ignored pages in the PHB: I’ve yet to meet a table that uses Trinkets
I have the opposite take. I fucking love detailed hard magic systems.
If you want deeper rules for things, PF2e is good. If you want simpler and more story-focused rules, picking up Index Card RPG or Knave might be good.
ayy Ars Magica
Isn’t HackMaster very explicitly written to be funny? I’m avoiding the term ‘satire’ because HM 5th Edition is not really satire (HmB page 2)
I am referring more to LFG
Honestly 5e has a bit of an identity crisis. It’s trying to go just there enough to support players who want a more generic fantasy adventuring game, and just trad enough to not scare off the people who want the D&D Experience:tm: as it was in the 80’s.
That’s the Pathfinder death system, if I recall correctly.