1/ unsure for every case

2/ don’t have enough data but just stating the trend: the top ranked schools are all public, just check out the rankings, tip top ones are all public nonprofit.

3/ I’m not super familiar with the entire landscape to know if all public schools are strictly better or not; I’m just aware of general public opinion that private schools are more expensive and more mid. Generally, less prestigious. However, at least as a personal observation, wealthier parents tend to choose to find a way for their kid to go to an overseas university if they don’t like the private schooling options after midling gaokao results. (as american born chinese these wealthy “princess complex” international classmates colored my impression of mainlanders for a while during my uni years… i suppose that’s both to my own and their detriment :/ it is what it is)

iirc rural area hukou students and ethnic minority students get boosted points for gaokao also, there’s definitely affirmative action in that regard.

edit: clarity

the gaokao competitiveness for top schooling actually is inverted (monetarily speaking) compared to the west. The top schools are usually publicly funded and have lower tuitions compared to private schools. (that said gaokao is very intense, I had a cousin who spent a whole year to redo it to try to get better placement)

“this trifold only folds twice! false advertising” really kills me lmfao

哪吒！！！！！！！！！

my bad I got tesla mixed up with orwell it’s the hair OTL

white jesus, lincoln, roosevelts, fuckin george orwell… i dont think he got that spirit tbh

hold up. the only thing that holds here imo is ‘great man theory’

edit: got tesla’s hair mixed up with orwell sorry king

fuller nuance (love to see libs beat the shit out of that word) perspective from someone who is black and of black culture who i think has better angles on all points than I could - tumblr post. excerpts:

The Super Bowl will always be a bread and circus event that lines the pockets of white shareholders. The fact that they allowed Black people to perform is simply to give the appearance of empowerment and progress, thus assuaging our appetite for real revolution by letting spectators woop and cheer and have the feeling that something happened.

context: US flag and americana imagery:

At the end of the above, all African Americans should be wary of narratives that corral them securely within the frame of the United States. This is an intentional set of blinders that keeps you seeing yourself as belonging to this outsized plantation. We made connection to this land, but we were brought here in chains.

in essence I agree it’s resistance liberal politics

so, with the whole drake thing, it’s larger and not specific to drake himself but what he “symbolizes” which is why the line "you’re not a colleague you’re a colonizer“ comes into play regarding black culture/outsiders who would discard the people of the culture he used and wrung out like a wet rag once he’s ready to move onto the next thing/larger more mainstream stage

/ I think the whole superbowl thing makes it feel more assimilationist and unchallenging rather than liberatory or empowering. im not sure if kendrick was fully ironic or what when incorporating “the revolution will not be televised” while he’s being played on America’s most watched televised event.

maybe im too harsh. maybe im importing too much frustration from assimilationist tendencies from my own background (chinese americans/canadians) into this situation (wherein a certain YA novel author is my own “drake”). idk

ah, facebook. say no more. (Also FLG is overtly and explicitly labeled a cult 邪教 in PRC)

the upvotes to comment ratio on this one is lol

actual article aside, I’ve never heard of this site before and i’m astounded in the sheer volume of regular comments on each post. interesting.

but she’s “already aware they are terrible people (except Sanders and AOC) but at least they are trying.”

oof. Those two might be left of dems but their track record speaks for itself… :/

I haven’t read the Ghodsee book, but wouldn’t be too surprised if it was eurocom.

Hang in there. I don’t really know what to classify my own partner politically but I at least know theyre somewhere on the left and think liberals suck. And they don’t take the other side when I push back against our more liberal friends when they speak ill of China. Deconstructing atrocity propaganda is an arduous uphill battle, even more so when it’s some else, but you’re right, framing it in condescending or ad hominem/they’re just liars (even if true) rhetoric isn’t very effective.

It’s very frustrating when liberals blame the very small sliver of non-republican opposition as the reason their campaigns failed, because it’s clearly just trying to find scapegoats instead of critically reflecting on why their campaigns were really unpopular, they have proven track records of repeated and repeated failed promises while shaking hands under the table with corporations to pass horrendous stuff… why when Ds are in power they make very minute gestures towards progressive policies and make a fuss that their hands are tied against making anything more concrete like roe v wade, and always make the biggest fuss when Rs actually pass policies that they promised – and this is somehow our fault when we point it out. The cherry on top of this shitty cake is their audience believes in this scapegoating.

that’s his online handle… truck nuts mentality anyone?

gonna obscure context regarding material/historical conditions on purpose for meme reasons but: tiktok has got nothing on those guys out there writing zines and successfully sparking momentum for a mass movement (new culture movement tho. mad respect that stuff was necessary for laying ground for revolution & marxism in china)

also something I noticed is that people are CONSTANTLY snacking. within reason, like things people would have actually snacked on at the time period - peanuts, sunflower seeds. Mao tho, bro loves chowing on raw chili peppers lol

edit: also leftist infighting book club

So what I recall for context of seeing this suggestion, is something along the lines of “Wow, what I hear about the US Gov and conditions from you guys reminds me of our own [Chinese] history during Republican era.” (This was a recurring comment I had seen in multiple places), so I think I found the recommendation (to someone else) along these lines.

and yeah. I get why someone might see parallels, it was a dark and chaotic time. I had known about it generally speaking, but with less context of social conditions, like social hierarchy/structure, or mass feeling of helplessness and not really knowing what to do or how to find a way out.

Obviously the specifics of the conditions of China in early 1900s are vastly different from US right now… much to think about.

watching 《觉醒年代》 Awakening Era at the suggestion of friends over from XHS(Rednote), though I’ve lost where I got that suggestion from. I’ve had more serious readings regarding modern Chinese history in my backlog but I’ve got a bunch of other stuff I want to prioritize too ;A; but anyway a dramatized rendition is a decent way to gain familiarity while having an easier time with reining in my attention. Enjoying it thusfar, got really emotional in the first episode when Chen Duxiu said (paraphrased) “our country is cooked, the old way of ‘revolution’ to change the leader but not the structure will not work. I don’t know the way yet, but I have to find a new way.” (context: Yuan Shikai’s beiyang government that was nominally a republic but eventually Yuan appointed himself emperor although that lasted for less than 3 months)

gee I thought the propaganda line was that China was oppressing muslims. what happened to that huh