![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
Well, (my vegetarian friend’s least favourite dumb philosophical question:) Is Death Even Actually Painful?
Well, (my vegetarian friend’s least favourite dumb philosophical question:) Is Death Even Actually Painful?
ooor, “people only get rich if they are not good, they do not stop being good as an actual result of having money”. That’s what I thought OP[1] meant.
The “equity” from "Private Equity (has consumed America by Sam “Wendover Productions”)? or which one? If you mean equality (also known as equity): do you mean how insisting on equality of e.g. external conditions (taxes, school curricula, etc.) is ableist or something?
the Biblical Angel/I Forgot Who It Was one was better
And/or it makes you sound like a zoologist
wow TIL
sex is not an adjective
The problem with that interpretation is that you can’t have “libraries turning into drug-infested, libraries turning into sex dens.” because “drug-infested” is not a noun phrase a library can turn into like “sex dens” is. I also tried misinterpreting this comma as a comma between two adjectives, which doesn’t work because “sex” is not an adjective. Maybe “Libraries turning drug-infested, into sex dens” fits your interpretation better. Does it?
I’m no grammar nerd but I think the comma makes “sex” an adjective, which should make me able to say that the drug-infested dens are “sex”.
this says a comma only splits coordinate adjectives, which can be swapped and where the latter does not form a common union with the noun, which means that even if “sex” were an adjective, the comma implies it can be swapped to make “sex, drug-infested dens” (single noun phrase), which it can’t because sex is not an adjective.
Edit: this proof by contradiction doesn’t quite work because adjectives have a preferred order by category of what they mean, and being coordinate doesn’t mean they are in the same category.
the comma definitely increases the humour for me
The modern school equivalent of cheap pranks on computers isn’t some elaborate virus, it’s just pressing the “mail” or “calculator” keys on the keyboard for the guy next to you. Never personally witnessed anything more elaborate, though my classmate apparently distributed dubious batch files he wrote once
I’ve been waiting for a joke like this. In hindsight, it was inevitable.
Though the only erotic things I’ve ever seen take at least some mental work to classify as porn, this does make me wonder how the taboo on this topic causes people and their experiences to be locked in 1-sized bubbles, because they only ever share these kinds of allusions and assume it’s the same for everyone else.
I need to know: Is that parenthesized bit a big exaggeration, do you mean you didn’t want to anymore, was it very long, or are there actually people for which porn takes on some infohazard-like quality where they can’t stop themselves so much that it’s actually exhausting? It’s not really your shame but all these cryptic allusions everyone here is making make me feel really out of touch.
the small benefits of being gay i guess
can you stop i’m not clicking on that
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Read the actual forum directly if you want to extend your daily fix of other tech people’s interesting opinions: https://www.realworldtech.com/forum/?threadid=217627&curpostid=217694
“The only problem about being immortal is that you need to drink blood, a set of ethical problems spanning a tetralogy”, so I haven’t really seen/read about the exact idea you’re talking about. Got any media where people actually say your kind of Immortality is bad?