pressing X to doubt that you only help keep information on students that you’re required to by law.
If we were to store private information or data that falls outside the boundaries of the law, we would be subject to arrest for unlawfully retaining children’s data. I want to emphasize to both you and OP that schools are legally obligated to store this information, and that I strongly advise against tampering with a device owned by the school.
That’s not how it works.
uncritical support for surveillance
We are, by law, required to keep this information. However, unlike many other schools, we have a byod policy that allows students to use their own device to essentially bypass this ‘surveillance’.
I work for a school and I provision these types of devices. You do not want to modify or change anything about them, as it probably breaks your acceptable use policy. If they allow you to bring your own device, then do that. But do not change the device they give you in any manner. Just don’t use school property for things you want to be private. It works the exact same way with anything owned by any organization you may work for in the future. They own the device, they set the terms. And your excuse of ‘it does not break policy’ or ‘it is not against the law’ is ridiculous, as policy is intentionally broad for this reason, and the law requires you to not interrupt normal classroom activities. If the school lets you, bring your own device. Otherwise, tough luck, seems like you won’t be able to play your games.
Also note that they found that gender affirming care in this form (boob removal) has a lower risk of breast cancer- because there is less breast.
Flea markets?
People, not censorship-prone dictatorships. There is a difference.
In other news, idiots exist everywhere. The interesting part will come when meta/threads responds to this.
Depending on how you count a mass shooting, and if you count the person in denver who (allegedly) changed their identity to avoid hate crime charges.
omg they are so cute!
It’s really interesting how some people wrongly claim that trans folks are more likely to commit mass shootings. The thing is, there aren’t many trans people out there, so if just one of them is involved in a shooting, it messes up the statistics. Basically, trans people aren’t going around shooting up places in any meaningful numbers, and anyone who says otherwise doesn’t understand statistical biases like insignificant number bias or sample selection bias work.
edit: Depending on how you count a mass shooting, and if you count the person in denver who (allegedly) changed their identity to avoid hate crime charges.
I never thought any republican ad would make me like trump even a little bit.
Okay, I have some results. Is it any of the following? It’s still searching, but these are what it found:
“You can’t have a * in a filename.”
“Its in the folder you downloaded for ScriptHookVDotNet probably, because that’s where it was for me.”
“https://www.wireless.att.com/premiercare/”
"do you mean the brush preview? that’s controlled by the drawing apps not the wacom driver
https://www.tvpaint.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=9913"
It’s searching for any comment 1-4 karma below a deleted comment. It’s a good thing it’s “That solved it. Thanks!” instead of “That solved it, Thanks!” (because commas are more common)
Currently indexing my archives for the exact words “That solved it. Thanks!” Will check back when it finishes
I’ll search for it.
They are, lol. Almost the entire site.
Give me a direct link, please? I can get it for you from my personal archives.
And the dude on the far right of the stage started to, but then quickly lowered it when he saw there would be no vote.