![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/70c5fe07-4a33-494a-b67b-164287421a94.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
“What do humans eat? sandwiches, ive heard of that”
“Oh yes i enjoy regular sandwiches just like all other regular humans. A big enjoyer of sandwiches. Yes. Uh fillings? What? No, I look after my teeth”
Conservative? Republican? Fuck yourselves. You’ll pay for your stupidity.
“What do humans eat? sandwiches, ive heard of that”
“Oh yes i enjoy regular sandwiches just like all other regular humans. A big enjoyer of sandwiches. Yes. Uh fillings? What? No, I look after my teeth”
The first line of my reply literally says I dont think this is what you mean, BUT …. I very clearly stated I assume that isnt exactly what the commenter meant. The rest of my comment is to clarify what the poster defined as “protection”.
If someone came up to me and asked protect something, contextually yes obviously I understand that.
That isnt the situation here. The comment chain is someone with a “hot take” on what “parents protecting children” means. It being a hot take I feel it is completely valid to put aside any assumption that the commenter is talking about “well obviously I mean protect them from x y z”. Because its a potentially unpopular hot take. It’s not a common idea in society.
Unless you can read minds it is very possible this commenter meant it literally. IE how kids are raised in the film 300. “Heres a stick. go fight a wolf kid”.
Im not writing it off. I assumed what they meant but followed up for clarification. Did you just expect replies to be “agree” or “disagree” with zero further discussion?
unless mating season was like, autumn
its a hypothetical situation
usually because it becomes very obvious the poster doesn’t want help and just wants to whine.
The solution to loneliness? Meet people. Find something you enjoy and find a group you can meet, online or otherwise. Start to find ways to build relationships with people.
“But I cant do literally anything to meet anyone ever”
Laziness.
What the fuck else does that mean? If you want to believe you can read minds and assume what a person is talking about, whatever.
But if someone makes a statement, maybe take it at face value rather than “ah yes they must mean something else”
fucking idiot
this poster is back again? no one finds you funny.
which exploit a loophole on low valued goods
In the article.
In the EU, the threshold for the levy is €150 (£127) and in the UK it is £135
In the UK, items valued at £39 or less also do not attract import VAT.
Last year, 2.3bn items below the duty-free €150 threshold were imported into the EU
The ones I am talking about don’t move under their own weight and gravity. If you held it with the cap upwards, it doesn’t rotate downwards unless you do it yourself
hence why getting hit in the face and struggling with a little cap is so puzzling to me
have microsoft tried logging it out and in again?
less knife friendly
Most places are advanced enough to not require their citizens to carry weaponry.
needing to always be armed is a uniquely american problem
Does america have terrible bottle designs or something? Not one single bottle with tethered cap has ever freely spun, you can move it and it stays in that position
Parents jobs arent to protect their kids
I get you don’t mean this so broadly but you lose all nuance with this statement.
Protect them from every minor mistake or risk that could ever possibly happen, and smothering them? Sure.
Someone about to stab your kid? Protect them from predators? Protect them from various risks and hazards in life which every parent should be teaching them?
what i think when people struggle with the cap hitting their face
Reading through this entire comment chain was interesting, because it seems everyone has missed each others points
FlyingSquid I believe means like, parents having a photo album (ie, a literal traditional physical one my mum had of me) which contains like “photo of first bath” or “photo of new t shirt but no bottoms cause running around as toddlers do”, completely innocent shit mixed in with general baby photos. And pulling that album out is used to embarrass the adult son/daughter with funny baby pictures and “haha look at baby you naked”, completely innocent humour. It might be less common these days, generationally people don’t do it as much.
nomus(?), killingtime(?) etc etc the others replying seem to be taking the comic literally as if the photos are solely of genitalia and thats the frame/centre point of the image instead of it just a kid doing something normal and happens to be nude.
I am sure flyingsquid isn’t going around with photos of their kids privates to show to people / send it to people etc with the specific intention of showing private areas but instead like my previous example, the kid is in the bath. Or running around without bottoms or a nappy cause it was changing time. Who knows. But its a far cry from the extreme end which everyone else seems to be assuming
its the default for all reddit/lemmy/other style platforms. The default assumption is of course everyone (in general) will upvote their own post. So setting it by default no one gets an advantage.
and what you’re asking for is a disadvantage to your posts
barcode on your taint
please tell me more
Cat reasoning? “Cause fuck you thats why. Now pick it up the place is a mess. Fuck you”
I get it but specifically with alcohol. For example having a very bad, messy night on scotch- just smelling it will now cause me to heave at least.
typical america moment
you get ID’d at the library.
Books? We must protect the children!
Guns? Oh, no take the children before my guns!