Came to think about @JonJones at twitter. The poor guys phone blows up anytime Jon “Bones” Jones has a fight coming or generally fucks up outside the octagon. The guy behind the tw… x account is a great guy though never meddim
Came to think about @JonJones at twitter. The poor guys phone blows up anytime Jon “Bones” Jones has a fight coming or generally fucks up outside the octagon. The guy behind the tw… x account is a great guy though never meddim
It’s not too hard when you’re Jesus, lol
What was in it? Or did we ever get an answer?
Furthermore we want to make Lemmy better and that includes learning from reddit - what should be the same, what should be changed and what should be added/removed/be like reddit “used to be” etc. It’s a software project not a summer flirt.
That’s not irony, that’s just hypocrisy
Is there a (feasible) way to crowdsource/democratize modding? E.g. having mandated regular elections in place for mods, alternatively for the rules? The latter being better maybe. If rules are voted/agreed on and then either the admins or some external, neutral ,(non community/“subreddit”-level) instance jury/court could handle complaints where the users feel that a mod has not acted appropriately/implemented the rules decided on
Hmmm