Oh, that would be cool. They are updating the node locations and making trains less costly in 1.0, so hopefully that is a lot more viable with 1 or 2 people.
Oh, that would be cool. They are updating the node locations and making trains less costly in 1.0, so hopefully that is a lot more viable with 1 or 2 people.
It is very complex. They are doing a lot of balancing in 1.0, so the it’ll probably be less brain breaking. Still complex I’m sure, though
For sure the same. Want to do a single player run, but multiplayer is a lot of fun. It turns some of the more ridiculous space elevator parts into a group project
something is unethical without stating or at least implying a specific ethical philosophy.
Which is why I followed it up by saying the best we can do is harm reduction by choosing the less harmful paths when we find them. Nothing you are saying is different to what I said, just a different wording
A. Not a “dude”
B. I’ll pose the same rhetorical as I did to the other person that didn’t think popularity was support:
If you see two pieces of identical software, one with 1000 downloads and one with 100,000, which would you choose?
I’m not sure of the origin, but that is a fair point. I typically us it in the context of there is no way to find a harm free source of anything in a capitalist society, so you have to find the path with the least amount of harm in it. That is basically what you are saying, but just tweaking the stated definition of ethical.
What? It was your hypothetical
If you see two pieces of identical software, one with 1000 downloads and one with 100,000, which would you choose?
Wow, what a slippery slope you’ve made.
Adding to popularity does support them.
Sure, there is no ethical consumerism under capitalism. But I can do harm reduction. When someone says or does something shitty, I can avoid or stop using their product. In your example, if a road worker came out publically with some transphobic nonsense, I could raise that to my local road authority and they would likely lose their job. Are there more people that have shitty views in this theoretical? Maybe, but they will be less likely to spew them if they know there are consequences.
Oh nice. Hadn’t heard a platform had been decided upon.
“What about the good things Hitler did?” Is not the flex you think it is. Also, using the Autobahn does not send support to Nazis
Good news, most folks at beehaw know and the admins have decided to move to a new platform
I thought the FFVII remakes were pretty well received?
I wasn’t attempting to start a debate, just talking about things i saw him do that could be reasons this would get reported. For the record, i was not one of the folks that reported it. I am willing to give some leeway when someone with a huge platform is edifying marginalized people.
Vaush is a divisive person, and has a checkered past. I’m glad to hear he has changed, but I, and probably quite a few folks, stopped paying attention to him when he was doing his edgy thing
I think you read into something I didn’t say. I never said we should remove this video. I was giving context for the reports mods were getting
BG3 is definitely not a LoL replacement. There is a tactical aspect to it, but it is much slower paced being turn based. For sure an RPG to it’s core.