• 1 Post
  • 166 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • Not bad ideas, but the forced pop-up asserts that there must be something sensitive about a user’s post. I think maybe providing a few categories of sensitivity with their own drop-down boxes to select from.

    These are terrible options, but for sexual they could be: Suggestive - from making sexual motions or comments to our model above Nudity - non-pornographic, but nipples or genitals are seen Porn

    Violence seems to be a major category. Now sure about how to break it down

    Gore Minor Injury Medical procedure Violent - these are bad options, I said

    Politics is something people complain about, but I don’t know if that should be considered sensitivity or if we should attempt to break it down.

    Abuse This one is hard because by only selecting over category you rule others out. Is my abuse less than yours?




  • I think this is a good conversion to have. I enjoy images of women, but everyone doesn’t. I also don’t feel it’s fair to compare these images to porn and play morality police.

    It makes sense to break NSFW into a handful of tags and allow more granular control. The problem historically was that the number of tags kept growing and became hard to classify.

    The number of tags wouldn’t be much of an issue, but then it comes down to the OP to tag appropriately. Even with generic NSFW filter turned on, I still occasionally see genitals in my feed.

    We could allow users to tag, but I see brigading and other abuses possible here. Appointing power users also might work, but that has its own list of issues. That also would mean that all this information would need to synch with the post.